ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-5.3 Codex vs GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-6.1 Sol 47, Claude Sonnet 5.5 47, GPT-5.3 Codex 42). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.3 Codex

    Released Feb 5, 2026

    42/100
    • ECI156.8
    • Price$1.75 / $14.00
    • Context400K
  2. OpenAI

    GPT-6.1 Sol

    Released Sep 29, 2026

    47/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $10.00
    • Context1.05M
  3. Anthropic

    Claude Sonnet 5.5

    Released Sep 28, 2026

    47/100
    • ECI165.2
    • Price$2.00 / $10.00
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GPT-6.1 Sol 47/100, Claude Sonnet 5.5 47/100, GPT-5.3 Codex 42/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-6.1 Sol on price and GPT-6.1 Sol for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 Sol $4.00 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 $4.00 · GPT-5.3 Codex $4.81 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Sol 1,050,000 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 1,000,000 · GPT-5.3 Codex 400,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsGPT-5.3 Codex: Text, Images, PDFs · GPT-6.1 Sol: Text, Images, PDFs · Claude Sonnet 5.5: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.3 CodexGPT-6.1 SolClaude Sonnet 5.5
Price50%182121
Inputs & features30%808080
Context window20%446160
Overall100%42/10047/10047/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.3 Codex vs GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.3 CodexOpenAIGPT-6.1 SolOpenAIClaude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)156.8—165.2 (best)
ECI rank#18 of 148—#3 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—95.4%95.6% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—93.7% (best)88.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—100%100%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues74.8%——
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions—73.9% (best)46.5%
Price per million tokens
Input$1.75 (best)$2.00$2.00
Output$14.00$10.00 (best)$10.00 (best)
Cached input$0.175$0.10 (best)$0.20
Blended (3:1)$4.81$4.00 (best)$4.00 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateOver 272K: $4.00 / $15.00Same rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Anthropic API
Limits
Context window400,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesYesYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhighYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgpt-5.3-codexgpt-6.1-solclaude-sonnet-5-5
API providers192123 (best)
ReleasedFeb 5, 2026Sep 29, 2026Sep 28, 2026
Knowledge cutoffAug 31, 2025Apr 30, 2026Jun 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.3 Codex$45.50
  • GPT-6.1 Sol$40.00
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5$40.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.3 Codex, GPT-6.1 Sol or Claude Sonnet 5.5?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GPT-6.1 Sol 47/100, Claude Sonnet 5.5 47/100, GPT-5.3 Codex 42/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-6.1 Sol on price and GPT-6.1 Sol for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Codex, GPT-6.1 Sol or Claude Sonnet 5.5?

GPT-6.1 Sol is cheaper at $2.00 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price); GPT-5.3 Codex costs $1.75 input / $14.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $4.00 per million tokens for GPT-6.1 Sol versus $4.00 for Claude Sonnet 5.5 (1× as much) and $4.81 for GPT-5.3 Codex (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GPT-5.3 Codex has an ECI of 156.8, GPT-6.1 Sol has not been scored yet and Claude Sonnet 5.5 has an ECI of 165.2.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Sonnet 5.5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol has the largest context window at 1,050,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 400,000 for GPT-5.3 Codex. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.3 Codex up to 128,000, GPT-6.1 Sol up to 128,000, Claude Sonnet 5.5 up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.3 Codex accepts text, images and PDFs; GPT-6.1 Sol accepts text, images and PDFs; Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts text, images and PDFs. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

No. GPT-5.3 Codex, GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Sonnet 5.5 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the newest, released Sep 29, 2026. Claude Sonnet 5.5 came out Sep 28, 2026; GPT-5.3 Codex came out Feb 5, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.3 Codex Aug 31, 2025, GPT-6.1 Sol Apr 30, 2026, Claude Sonnet 5.5 Jun 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.