GPT-5.3 Codex Spark vs Qwen3.8 Max Preview
Qwen3.8 Max Preview comes out ahead, 47 to 38 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark
38/100- ECI—
- Price$1.75 / $14.00
- Context128K
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3.8 Max Preview
47/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen3.8 Max Preview is our pick
Qwen3.8 Max Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 47/100 against GPT-5.3 Codex Spark (38). It leads on price and context window. GPT-5.3 Codex Spark wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3.8 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Max Preview $3.00 · GPT-5.3 Codex Spark $4.81 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.8 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Max Preview 1,000,000 · GPT-5.3 Codex Spark 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGPT-5.3 Codex Spark: Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen3.8 Max Preview: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | GPT-5.3 Codex Spark | Qwen3.8 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 18 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 38/100 | 47/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.75 (best) | $2.00 |
| Output | $14.00 | $6.00 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.175 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.81 | $3.00 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Median of 6 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 32,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gpt-5.3-codex-spark | — |
| API providers | 1 | 6 (best) |
| Released | Feb 5, 2026 | Jul 19, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 31, 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark$45.50
Qwen3.8 Max Preview$32.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-5.3 Codex Spark or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?
Qwen3.8 Max Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 47/100 against GPT-5.3 Codex Spark (38). It leads on price and context window. GPT-5.3 Codex Spark wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Codex Spark or Qwen3.8 Max Preview?
Qwen3.8 Max Preview is cheaper at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 6 API providers). GPT-5.3 Codex Spark costs $1.75 input / $14.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Qwen3.8 Max Preview versus $4.81 for GPT-5.3 Codex Spark (1.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. GPT-5.3 Codex Spark has not been scored yet and Qwen3.8 Max Preview has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.3 Codex Spark and Qwen3.8 Max Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 Max Preview has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 128,000 for GPT-5.3 Codex Spark. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.3 Codex Spark up to 32,000, Qwen3.8 Max Preview up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-5.3 Codex Spark accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen3.8 Max Preview accepts text, images and video. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. GPT-5.3 Codex Spark and Qwen3.8 Max Preview are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.8 Max Preview is the newest, released Jul 19, 2026. GPT-5.3 Codex Spark came out Feb 5, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.3 Codex Spark Aug 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.