ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark vs Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Command A Plus

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed comes out ahead, 44 to 38 and 35 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.3 Codex Spark

    Released Feb 5, 2026

    38/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.75 / $14.00
    • Context128K
  2. Our pick

    Moonshot AI

    Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed

    Released Jun 12, 2026

    44/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.90 / $8.00
    • Context262K
  3. Cohere

    Command A Plus

    Released May 20, 2026

    35/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.50 / $10.00
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed is our pick

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed is the better all-round choice, scoring 44/100 against GPT-5.3 Codex Spark (38) and Command A Plus (35). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed $3.42 · Command A Plus $4.38 · GPT-5.3 Codex Spark $4.81 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed 262,144 · GPT-5.3 Codex Spark 128,000 · Command A Plus 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-5.3 Codex Spark and Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedGPT-5.3 Codex Spark: Text, Images, PDFs · Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed: Text, Images, Video · Command A Plus: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed and Command A PlusPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.3 Codex SparkKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedCommand A Plus
Price50%182519
Inputs & features30%808070
Context window20%243724
Overall100%38/10044/10035/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark vs Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Command A Plus specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.3 Codex SparkOpenAIKimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshot AICommand A PlusCohere
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.75 (best)$1.90$2.50
Output$14.00$8.00 (best)$10.00
Cached input$0.175——
Blended (3:1)$4.81$3.42 (best)$4.38
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIMedian of 11 providersOfficial Cohere API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output32,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)64,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhighYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpen
API model IDgpt-5.3-codex-spark—command-a-plus-05-2026
API providers111 (best)1
ReleasedFeb 5, 2026Jun 12, 2026May 20, 2026
Knowledge cutoffAug 31, 2025Jan 2025Apr 1, 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.3 Codex Spark$45.50
  • Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed$35.00
  • Command A Plus$45.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.3 Codex Spark, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed or Command A Plus?

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed is the better all-round choice, scoring 44/100 against GPT-5.3 Codex Spark (38) and Command A Plus (35). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3 Codex Spark, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed or Command A Plus?

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed is cheaper at $1.90 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). Command A Plus costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price); GPT-5.3 Codex Spark costs $1.75 input / $14.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.42 per million tokens for Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed versus $4.38 for Command A Plus (1.3× as much) and $4.81 for GPT-5.3 Codex Spark (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GPT-5.3 Codex Spark has not been scored yet, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed has not been scored yet and Command A Plus has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.3 Codex Spark, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed and Command A Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 128,000 for GPT-5.3 Codex Spark and 128,000 for Command A Plus. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.3 Codex Spark up to 32,000, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed up to 262,144, Command A Plus up to 64,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.3 Codex Spark accepts text, images and PDFs; Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed accepts text, images and video; Command A Plus accepts text and images. GPT-5.3 Codex Spark handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed and Command A Plus publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.3 Codex Spark is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed is the newest, released Jun 12, 2026. Command A Plus came out May 20, 2026; GPT-5.3 Codex Spark came out Feb 5, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.3 Codex Spark Aug 31, 2025, Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed Jan 2025, Command A Plus Apr 1, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.