ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-5.2 vs Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Too close to call on our weighted score (Grok 4.3 67, Kimi K2.7 Code 64, GPT-5.2 61). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.2

    Released Dec 11, 2025

    61/100
    • ECI153.5
    • Price$1.75 / $14.00
    • Context400K
  2. xAI

    Grok 4.3

    Released Apr 17, 2026

    67/100
    • ECI149.2
    • Price$1.25 / $2.50
    • Context1M
  3. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K2.7 Code

    Released Jun 12, 2026

    64/100
    • ECI150.0
    • Price$0.95 / $4.00
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Grok 4.3 67/100, Kimi K2.7 Code 64/100, GPT-5.2 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.2 for raw capability, Grok 4.3 on price and Grok 4.3 for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGPT-5.2Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.2 153.5 · Kimi K2.7 Code 150.0 · Grok 4.3 149.2
  • Lowest priceGrok 4.3Grok 4.3 $1.56 · Kimi K2.7 Code $1.71 · GPT-5.2 $4.81 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGrok 4.3Grok 4.3 1,000,000 · GPT-5.2 400,000 · Kimi K2.7 Code 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsGrok 4.3 and Kimi K2.7 CodeGPT-5.2: Text, Images · Grok 4.3: Text, Images, PDFs · Kimi K2.7 Code: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingKimi K2.7 CodePublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.2Grok 4.3Kimi K2.7 Code
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%837778
Price25%184139
Inputs & features15%708080
Context window10%446037
Overall100%61/10067/10064/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.2 vs Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K2.7 Code specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.2OpenAIGrok 4.3xAIKimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)153.5 (best)149.2150.0
ECI rank#38 of 148 (best)#55 of 148#49 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions91.4% (best)88.8%87.9%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics67.4% (best)42.8%54.0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics96.1% (best)93.3%95.6%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues73.8%——
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions37.1% (best)33.2%36.5%
Price per million tokens
Input$1.75$1.25$0.95 (best)
Output$14.00$2.50 (best)$4.00
Cached input$0.175 (best)$0.20$0.19
Blended (3:1)$4.81$1.56 (best)$1.71
Long-context rateSame rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $5.00Same rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial xAI APIOfficial Moonshot AI API
Limits
Context window400,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)262,144 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens30,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoYesNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhighYeslow · medium · highYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpen
API model IDgpt-5.2grok-4.3kimi-k2.7-code
API providers212751 (best)
ReleasedDec 11, 2025Apr 17, 2026Jun 12, 2026
Knowledge cutoffAug 31, 2025—Jan 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.2$45.50
  • Grok 4.3$17.50
  • Kimi K2.7 Code$17.50
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.2, Grok 4.3 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Grok 4.3 67/100, Kimi K2.7 Code 64/100, GPT-5.2 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.2 for raw capability, Grok 4.3 on price and Grok 4.3 for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2, Grok 4.3 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Grok 4.3 is cheaper at $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.95 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Moonshot AI API price); GPT-5.2 costs $1.75 input / $14.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.56 per million tokens for Grok 4.3 versus $1.71 for Kimi K2.7 Code (1.1× as much) and $4.81 for GPT-5.2 (3.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GPT-5.2 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.2 153.5 (#38 of 148), Kimi K2.7 Code 150.0 (#49 of 148) and Grok 4.3 149.2 (#55 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (151.7–155.4 vs 148.1–151.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GPT-5.2 91.4%, Grok 4.3 88.8%, Kimi K2.7 Code 87.9%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-5.2 67.4%, Kimi K2.7 Code 54.0%, Grok 4.3 42.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-5.2 96.1%, Kimi K2.7 Code 95.6%, Grok 4.3 93.3%; SimpleQA Verified — GPT-5.2 37.1%, Kimi K2.7 Code 36.5%, Grok 4.3 33.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K2.7 Code yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-5.2 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.3 has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5.2 and 262,144 for Kimi K2.7 Code. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.2 up to 128,000, Grok 4.3 up to 30,000, Kimi K2.7 Code up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.2 accepts text and images; Grok 4.3 accepts text, images and PDFs; Kimi K2.7 Code accepts text, images and video. Grok 4.3 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Kimi K2.7 Code publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.2 and Grok 4.3 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the newest, released Jun 12, 2026. Grok 4.3 came out Apr 17, 2026; GPT-5.2 came out Dec 11, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.2 Aug 31, 2025, Kimi K2.7 Code Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.