ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-5.2 vs GPT-5.3 Codex vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-5.3 Codex 64, Claude Sonnet 4.6 62, GPT-5.2 61). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.2

    Released Dec 11, 2025

    61/100
    • ECI153.5
    • Price$1.75 / $14.00
    • Context400K
  2. OpenAI

    GPT-5.3 Codex

    Released Feb 5, 2026

    64/100
    • ECI156.8
    • Price$1.75 / $14.00
    • Context400K
  3. Anthropic

    Claude Sonnet 4.6

    Released Feb 17, 2026

    62/100
    • ECI152.3
    • Price$3.00 / $15.00
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT-5.3 Codex 64/100, Claude Sonnet 4.6 62/100, GPT-5.2 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.3 Codex for raw capability, GPT-5.2 on price and Claude Sonnet 4.6 for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGPT-5.3 CodexCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.3 Codex 156.8 · GPT-5.2 153.5 · Claude Sonnet 4.6 152.3
  • Lowest priceGPT-5.2 and GPT-5.3 CodexGPT-5.2 $4.81 · GPT-5.3 Codex $4.81 · Claude Sonnet 4.6 $6.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextClaude Sonnet 4.6Claude Sonnet 4.6 1,000,000 · GPT-5.2 400,000 · GPT-5.3 Codex 400,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-5.3 Codex and Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5.2: Text, Images · GPT-5.3 Codex: Text, Images, PDFs · Claude Sonnet 4.6: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.2GPT-5.3 CodexClaude Sonnet 4.6
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%838781
Price25%181813
Inputs & features15%708080
Context window10%444460
Overall100%61/10064/10062/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.2 vs GPT-5.3 Codex vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.2OpenAIGPT-5.3 CodexOpenAIClaude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)153.5156.8 (best)152.3
ECI rank#38 of 148#18 of 148 (best)#40 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions91.4% (best)—87.4%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics67.4%——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics96.1% (best)—85.8%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues73.8%74.8%75.2% (best)
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions37.1% (best)—35.5%
Price per million tokens
Input$1.75 (best)$1.75 (best)$3.00
Output$14.00 (best)$14.00 (best)$15.00
Cached input$0.175 (best)$0.175 (best)$0.30
Blended (3:1)$4.81 (best)$4.81 (best)$6.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Anthropic API
Limits
Context window400,000 tokens400,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output128,000 tokens (best)128,000 tokens (best)64,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoYesYes
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · high · xhighYeslow · medium · high · xhighYeslow · medium · high · max
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgpt-5.2gpt-5.3-codexclaude-sonnet-4-6
API providers211941 (best)
ReleasedDec 11, 2025Feb 5, 2026Feb 17, 2026
Knowledge cutoffAug 31, 2025Aug 31, 2025Aug 31, 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.2$45.50
  • GPT-5.3 Codex$45.50
  • Claude Sonnet 4.6$60.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.2, GPT-5.3 Codex or Claude Sonnet 4.6?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT-5.3 Codex 64/100, Claude Sonnet 4.6 62/100, GPT-5.2 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.3 Codex for raw capability, GPT-5.2 on price and Claude Sonnet 4.6 for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2, GPT-5.3 Codex or Claude Sonnet 4.6?

GPT-5.2 is cheaper at $1.75 input / $14.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). GPT-5.3 Codex costs $1.75 input / $14.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00 input / $15.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $4.81 per million tokens for GPT-5.2 versus $4.81 for GPT-5.3 Codex (1× as much) and $6.00 for Claude Sonnet 4.6 (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.3 Codex 156.8 (#18 of 148), GPT-5.2 153.5 (#38 of 148) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 152.3 (#40 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (153.5–160.8 vs 151.7–155.4), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: SWE-bench Verified — Claude Sonnet 4.6 75.2%, GPT-5.3 Codex 74.8%, GPT-5.2 73.8%.

Which is better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 resolves more real GitHub issues on SWE-bench Verified: Claude Sonnet 4.6 75.2%, GPT-5.3 Codex 74.8% and GPT-5.2 73.8%. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5.2 and 400,000 for GPT-5.3 Codex. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.2 up to 128,000, GPT-5.3 Codex up to 128,000, Claude Sonnet 4.6 up to 64,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.2 accepts text and images; GPT-5.3 Codex accepts text, images and PDFs; Claude Sonnet 4.6 accepts text, images and PDFs. GPT-5.3 Codex handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. GPT-5.2, GPT-5.3 Codex and Claude Sonnet 4.6 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the newest, released Feb 17, 2026. GPT-5.3 Codex came out Feb 5, 2026; GPT-5.2 came out Dec 11, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.2 Aug 31, 2025, GPT-5.3 Codex Aug 31, 2025, Claude Sonnet 4.6 Aug 31, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.