ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-5.1 vs Inkling vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-5.1 60, Inkling 59, Qwen3.6 Max Preview 54). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.1

    Released Nov 13, 2025

    60/100
    • ECI149.7
    • Price$1.25 / $10.00
    • Context400K
  2. Thinking Machines

    Inkling

    Released Jul 15, 2026

    59/100
    • ECI148.6
    • Price$3.74 / $9.36
    • Context1.05M
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview

    Released Apr 20, 2026

    54/100
    • ECI149.2
    • Price$1.30 / $7.80
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (GPT-5.1 60/100, Inkling 59/100, Qwen3.6 Max Preview 54/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.1 for raw capability, Qwen3.6 Max Preview on price and Inkling for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGPT-5.1Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.1 149.7 · Qwen3.6 Max Preview 149.2 · Inkling 148.6
  • Lowest priceQwen3.6 Max PreviewQwen3.6 Max Preview $2.92 · GPT-5.1 $3.44 · Inkling $5.14 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextInklingInkling 1,048,576 · GPT-5.1 400,000 · Qwen3.6 Max Preview 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsInklingGPT-5.1: Text, Images · Inkling: Text, Images, Audio · Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Text
  • Self-hostingInklingPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.1InklingQwen3.6 Max Preview
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%787677
Price25%241628
Inputs & features15%707035
Context window10%446137
Overall100%60/10059/10054/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.1 vs Inkling vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.1OpenAIInklingThinking MachinesQwen3.6 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)149.7 (best)148.6149.2
ECI rank#52 of 148 (best)#57 of 148#54 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions87.6%88.3% (best)87.4%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—33.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics88.6%88.9%91.1% (best)
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues68.0%—76.7% (best)
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions48.0%40.3%52.0% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25 (best)$3.74$1.30
Output$10.00$9.36$7.80 (best)
Cached input$0.125 (best)$0.748$0.13
Blended (3:1)$3.44$5.14$2.92 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Thinking Machines APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window400,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)262,144 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · highYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenApache-2.0Proprietary
API model IDgpt-5.1thinkingmachines/Inkling:peft:262144qwen3.6-max-preview
API providers2123 (best)10
ReleasedNov 13, 2025Jul 15, 2026Apr 20, 2026
Knowledge cutoffSep 30, 2024—Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.1$32.50
  • Inkling$56.12
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview$28.60
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.1, Inkling or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (GPT-5.1 60/100, Inkling 59/100, Qwen3.6 Max Preview 54/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.1 for raw capability, Qwen3.6 Max Preview on price and Inkling for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1, Inkling or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is cheaper at $1.30 input / $7.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). GPT-5.1 costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Inkling costs $3.74 input / $9.36 output per million tokens (official Thinking Machines API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.92 per million tokens for Qwen3.6 Max Preview versus $3.44 for GPT-5.1 (1.2× as much) and $5.14 for Inkling (1.8× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GPT-5.1 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.1 149.7 (#52 of 148), Qwen3.6 Max Preview 149.2 (#54 of 148) and Inkling 148.6 (#57 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (148.3–151.1 vs 147.6–152.0), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Inkling 88.3%, GPT-5.1 87.6%, Qwen3.6 Max Preview 87.4%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3.6 Max Preview 91.1%, Inkling 88.9%, GPT-5.1 88.6%; SimpleQA Verified — Qwen3.6 Max Preview 52.0%, GPT-5.1 48.0%, Inkling 40.3%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Inkling yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-5.1 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5.1 and 262,144 for Qwen3.6 Max Preview. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.1 up to 128,000, Inkling up to 1,048,576, Qwen3.6 Max Preview up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.1 accepts text and images; Inkling accepts text, images and audio; Qwen3.6 Max Preview accepts text. Inkling handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Inkling publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.1 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Inkling is the newest, released Jul 15, 2026. Qwen3.6 Max Preview came out Apr 20, 2026; GPT-5.1 came out Nov 13, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.1 Sep 30, 2024, Qwen3.6 Max Preview Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.