ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-5.1 vs Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Grok 4.3 comes out ahead, 67 to 60 and 54 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-5.1

    Released Nov 13, 2025

    60/100
    • ECI149.7
    • Price$1.25 / $10.00
    • Context400K
  2. Our pick

    xAI

    Grok 4.3

    Released Apr 17, 2026

    67/100
    • ECI149.2
    • Price$1.25 / $2.50
    • Context1M
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.6 Max Preview

    Released Apr 20, 2026

    54/100
    • ECI149.2
    • Price$1.30 / $7.80
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Grok 4.3 is our pick

Grok 4.3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against GPT-5.1 (60) and Qwen3.6 Max Preview (54). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGPT-5.1Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.1 149.7 · Qwen3.6 Max Preview 149.2 · Grok 4.3 149.2
  • Lowest priceGrok 4.3Grok 4.3 $1.56 · Qwen3.6 Max Preview $2.92 · GPT-5.1 $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGrok 4.3Grok 4.3 1,000,000 · GPT-5.1 400,000 · Qwen3.6 Max Preview 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsGrok 4.3GPT-5.1: Text, Images · Grok 4.3: Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Text
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-5.1Grok 4.3Qwen3.6 Max Preview
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%787777
Price25%244128
Inputs & features15%708035
Context window10%446037
Overall100%60/10067/10054/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-5.1 vs Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-5.1OpenAIGrok 4.3xAIQwen3.6 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)149.7 (best)149.2149.2
ECI rank#52 of 148 (best)#55 of 148#54 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions87.6%88.8% (best)87.4%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—42.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics88.6%93.3% (best)91.1%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues68.0%—76.7% (best)
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions48.0%33.2%52.0% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25 (best)$1.25 (best)$1.30
Output$10.00$2.50 (best)$7.80
Cached input$0.125 (best)$0.20$0.13
Blended (3:1)$3.44$1.56 (best)$2.92
Long-context rateSame rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $5.00Same rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial xAI APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window400,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)262,144 tokens
Max output128,000 tokens (best)30,000 tokens65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsNoYesNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · highYeslow · medium · highYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgpt-5.1grok-4.3qwen3.6-max-preview
API providers2127 (best)10
ReleasedNov 13, 2025Apr 17, 2026Apr 20, 2026
Knowledge cutoffSep 30, 2024—Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-5.1$32.50
  • Grok 4.3$17.50
  • Qwen3.6 Max Preview$28.60
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-5.1, Grok 4.3 or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Grok 4.3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against GPT-5.1 (60) and Qwen3.6 Max Preview (54). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1, Grok 4.3 or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Grok 4.3 is cheaper at $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). Qwen3.6 Max Preview costs $1.30 input / $7.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); GPT-5.1 costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.56 per million tokens for Grok 4.3 versus $2.92 for Qwen3.6 Max Preview (1.9× as much) and $3.44 for GPT-5.1 (2.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GPT-5.1 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.1 149.7 (#52 of 148), Qwen3.6 Max Preview 149.2 (#54 of 148) and Grok 4.3 149.2 (#55 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (148.3–151.1 vs 147.6–152.0), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Grok 4.3 88.8%, GPT-5.1 87.6%, Qwen3.6 Max Preview 87.4%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Grok 4.3 93.3%, Qwen3.6 Max Preview 91.1%, GPT-5.1 88.6%; SimpleQA Verified — Qwen3.6 Max Preview 52.0%, GPT-5.1 48.0%, Grok 4.3 33.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-5.1 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.3 has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5.1 and 262,144 for Qwen3.6 Max Preview. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.1 up to 128,000, Grok 4.3 up to 30,000, Qwen3.6 Max Preview up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-5.1 accepts text and images; Grok 4.3 accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen3.6 Max Preview accepts text. Grok 4.3 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. GPT-5.1, Grok 4.3 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the newest, released Apr 20, 2026. Grok 4.3 came out Apr 17, 2026; GPT-5.1 came out Nov 13, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.1 Sep 30, 2024, Qwen3.6 Max Preview Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.