ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct comes out ahead, 62 to 43 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-4o

    Released May 13, 2024

    43/100
    • ECI129.0
    • Price$2.50 / $10.00
    • Context128K
    Full specs Remove GPT-4o
  2. Our pick

    Meta

    Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

    Released Apr 5, 2025

    62/100
    • ECI129.7
    • Price$0.225 / $0.69
    • Context10M
    Full specs Remove Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is our pick

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against GPT-4o (43). It leads on price and context window. GPT-4o wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructCapabilities Index (ECI): Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7 · GPT-4o 129.0
  • Lowest priceLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct $0.341 · GPT-4o $4.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 10,000,000 · GPT-4o 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-4oGPT-4o: Text, Images, PDFs · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-4oLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%5252
Price25%1972
Inputs & features15%7050
Context window10%24100
Overall100%43/10062/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-4oOpenAILlama 4 Scout 17B InstructMeta
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)129.0129.7 (best)
ECI rank#129 of 148#126 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions48.9%51.8% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics6.3%7.8% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$2.50$0.225 (best)
Output$10.00$0.69 (best)
Cached input$1.25—
Blended (3:1)$4.38$0.341 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIMedian of 4 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens10,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output16,384 tokens16,384 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsYesNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpen
API model IDgpt-4o—
API providers19 (best)4
ReleasedMay 13, 2024Apr 5, 2025
Knowledge cutoffSep 2023Aug 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-4o$45.00
  • Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct$3.63
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-4o or Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against GPT-4o (43). It leads on price and context window. GPT-4o wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is cheaper at $0.225 input / $0.69 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). GPT-4o costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.341 per million tokens for Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct versus $4.38 for GPT-4o (13× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7 (#126 of 148) and GPT-4o 129.0 (#129 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (124.8–131.4 vs 124.2–131.5), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 51.8%, GPT-4o 48.9%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 7.8%, GPT-4o 6.3%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-4o and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct has the largest context window at 10,000,000 tokens, against 128,000 for GPT-4o. Maximum output per response: GPT-4o up to 16,384, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-4o accepts text, images and PDFs; Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct accepts text and images. GPT-4o handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-4o is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the newest, released Apr 5, 2025. GPT-4o came out May 13, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-4o Sep 2023, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct Aug 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons