ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-4o mini vs Nova Pro vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-4o mini 56, Mistral Small 3.1 24B 55, Nova Pro 48). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. OpenAI

    GPT-4o mini

    Released Jul 18, 2024

    56/100
    • ECI126.6
    • Price$0.15 / $0.60
    • Context128K
  2. Amazon

    Nova Pro

    Released Dec 3, 2024

    48/100
    • ECI123.8
    • Price$0.80 / $3.20
    • Context300K
  3. Mistral AI

    Mistral Small 3.1 24B

    Released Mar 17, 2025

    55/100
    • ECI127.5
    • Price$0.229 / $0.436
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (GPT-4o mini 56/100, Mistral Small 3.1 24B 55/100, Nova Pro 48/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Small 3.1 24B for raw capability, GPT-4o mini on price and Nova Pro for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityMistral Small 3.1 24BCapabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Small 3.1 24B 127.5 · GPT-4o mini 126.6 · Nova Pro 123.8
  • Lowest priceGPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini $0.263 · Mistral Small 3.1 24B $0.281 · Nova Pro $1.40 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextNova ProNova Pro 300,000 · GPT-4o mini 128,000 · Mistral Small 3.1 24B 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsNova ProGPT-4o mini: Text, Images, PDFs · Nova Pro: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Mistral Small 3.1 24B: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingMistral Small 3.1 24BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-4o miniNova ProMistral Small 3.1 24B
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%494550
Price25%774376
Inputs & features15%707060
Context window10%243924
Overall100%56/10048/10055/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-4o mini vs Nova Pro vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-4o miniOpenAINova ProAmazonMistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)126.6123.8127.5 (best)
ECI rank#135 of 148#137 of 148#132 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions37.7%—47.5% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics0.7%——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics6.9% (best)—5.8%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions8.3%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15 (best)$0.80$0.229
Output$0.60$3.20$0.436 (best)
Cached input$0.075 (best)$0.20—
Blended (3:1)$0.263 (best)$1.40$0.281
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Amazon Bedrock APIMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens300,000 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens (best)10,000 tokens16,384 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesYesNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpen
API model IDgpt-4o-miniamazon.nova-pro-v1:0—
API providers21 (best)32
ReleasedJul 18, 2024Dec 3, 2024Mar 17, 2025
Knowledge cutoffSep 2023Oct 2024Jun 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-4o mini$2.70
  • Nova Pro$14.40
  • Mistral Small 3.1 24B$3.16
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-4o mini, Nova Pro or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (GPT-4o mini 56/100, Mistral Small 3.1 24B 55/100, Nova Pro 48/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Small 3.1 24B for raw capability, GPT-4o mini on price and Nova Pro for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o mini, Nova Pro or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

GPT-4o mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.229 input / $0.436 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); Nova Pro costs $0.80 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for GPT-4o mini versus $0.281 for Mistral Small 3.1 24B (1.1× as much) and $1.40 for Nova Pro (5.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Small 3.1 24B 127.5 (#132 of 148), GPT-4o mini 126.6 (#135 of 148) and Nova Pro 123.8 (#137 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (122.6–129.4 vs 120.5–128.5), so treat the gap as small.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-4o mini, Nova Pro and Mistral Small 3.1 24B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Mistral Small 3.1 24B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Pro has the largest context window at 300,000 tokens, against 128,000 for GPT-4o mini and 128,000 for Mistral Small 3.1 24B. Maximum output per response: GPT-4o mini up to 16,384, Nova Pro up to 10,000, Mistral Small 3.1 24B up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-4o mini accepts text, images and PDFs; Nova Pro accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Mistral Small 3.1 24B accepts text and images. Nova Pro handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-4o mini and Nova Pro is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B is the newest, released Mar 17, 2025. Nova Pro came out Dec 3, 2024; GPT-4o mini came out Jul 18, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-4o mini Sep 2023, Nova Pro Oct 2024, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Jun 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.