ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-4o mini vs Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct vs Mixtral 8x7B

GPT-4o mini comes out ahead, 56 to 44 and 37 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-4o mini

    Released Jul 18, 2024

    56/100
    • ECI126.6
    • Price$0.15 / $0.60
    • Context128K
  2. Meta

    Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct

    Released Jul 23, 2024

    44/100
    • ECI125.9
    • Price$0.72 / $0.72
    • Context128K
  3. Mistral AI

    Mixtral 8x7B

    Released Dec 11, 2023

    37/100
    • ECI118.5
    • Price$0.70 / $0.70
    • Context32K
01 — Verdict

GPT-4o mini is our pick

GPT-4o mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (44) and Mixtral 8x7B (37). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGPT-4o miniCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4o mini 126.6 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 125.9 · Mixtral 8x7B 118.5
  • Lowest priceGPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini $0.263 · Mixtral 8x7B $0.70 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct $0.72 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-4o mini and Llama-3.1-70B-InstructGPT-4o mini 128,000 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 128,000 · Mixtral 8x7B 32,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini: Text, Images, PDFs · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct: Text · Mixtral 8x7B: Text
  • Self-hostingLlama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Mixtral 8x7BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-4o miniLlama-3.1-70B-InstructMixtral 8x7B
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%494838
Price25%775757
Inputs & features15%702525
Context window10%24240
Overall100%56/10044/10037/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-4o mini vs Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct vs Mixtral 8x7B specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-4o miniOpenAILlama-3.1-70B-InstructMetaMixtral 8x7BMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)126.6 (best)125.9118.5
ECI rank#135 of 148 (best)#136 of 148#142 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions37.7%44.2% (best)30.6%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics0.7%——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics6.9% (best)3.6%—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions8.3%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15 (best)$0.72$0.70
Output$0.60 (best)$0.72$0.70
Cached input$0.075——
Blended (3:1)$0.263 (best)$0.72$0.70
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIMedian of 5 providersOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens (best)128,000 tokens (best)32,000 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens4,096 tokens32,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpen
API model IDgpt-4o-mini—open-mixtral-8x7b
API providers21 (best)51
ReleasedJul 18, 2024Jul 23, 2024Dec 11, 2023
Knowledge cutoffSep 2023Dec 2023Jan 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-4o mini$2.70
  • Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct$8.64
  • Mixtral 8x7B$8.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct or Mixtral 8x7B?

GPT-4o mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (44) and Mixtral 8x7B (37). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct or Mixtral 8x7B?

GPT-4o mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Mixtral 8x7B costs $0.70 input / $0.70 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct costs $0.72 input / $0.72 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for GPT-4o mini versus $0.70 for Mixtral 8x7B (2.7× as much) and $0.72 for Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (2.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GPT-4o mini scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4o mini 126.6 (#135 of 148), Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 125.9 (#136 of 148) and Mixtral 8x7B 118.5 (#142 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (120.5–128.5 vs 121.0–128.1), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 44.2%, GPT-4o mini 37.7%, Mixtral 8x7B 30.6%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Mixtral 8x7B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-4o mini leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4o mini and Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct have the largest context windows (128,000 and 128,000 tokens), against 32,000 for Mixtral 8x7B. Maximum output per response: GPT-4o mini up to 16,384, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct up to 4,096, Mixtral 8x7B up to 32,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-4o mini accepts text, images and PDFs; Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct accepts text; Mixtral 8x7B accepts text. GPT-4o mini handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Mixtral 8x7B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-4o mini is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct is the newest, released Jul 23, 2024. GPT-4o mini came out Jul 18, 2024; Mixtral 8x7B came out Dec 11, 2023. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-4o mini Sep 2023, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct Dec 2023, Mixtral 8x7B Jan 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.