GPT-4o mini vs Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct vs Mixtral 8x22B
GPT-4o mini comes out ahead, 56 to 44 and 33 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
56/100- ECI126.6
- Price$0.15 / $0.60
- Context128K
Meta
Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct
44/100- ECI125.9
- Price$0.72 / $0.72
- Context128K
Mistral AI
Mixtral 8x22B
33/100- ECI122.0
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context64K
GPT-4o mini is our pick
GPT-4o mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (44) and Mixtral 8x22B (33). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGPT-4o miniCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4o mini 126.6 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 125.9 · Mixtral 8x22B 122.0
- Lowest priceGPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini $0.263 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct $0.72 · Mixtral 8x22B $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-4o mini and Llama-3.1-70B-InstructGPT-4o mini 128,000 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 128,000 · Mixtral 8x22B 64,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini: Text, Images, PDFs · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct: Text · Mixtral 8x22B: Text
- Self-hostingLlama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Mixtral 8x22BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GPT-4o mini | Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 49 | 48 | 43 |
| Price | 25% | 77 | 57 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 10% | 24 | 24 | 12 |
| Overall | 100% | 56/100 | 44/100 | 33/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 126.6 (best) | 125.9 | 122.0 |
| ECI rank | #135 of 148 (best) | #136 of 148 | #139 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 37.7% | 44.2% (best) | 34.1% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 0.7% | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 6.9% (best) | 3.6% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 8.3% | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.15 (best) | $0.72 | $2.00 |
| Output | $0.60 (best) | $0.72 | $6.00 |
| Cached input | $0.075 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.263 (best) | $0.72 | $3.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Median of 5 providers | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens (best) | 64,000 tokens |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens | 4,096 tokens | 64,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| API model ID | gpt-4o-mini | — | open-mixtral-8x22b |
| API providers | 21 (best) | 5 | 1 |
| Released | Jul 18, 2024 | Jul 23, 2024 | Apr 17, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Apr 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
GPT-4o mini$2.70
Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct$8.64
Mixtral 8x22B$32.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct or Mixtral 8x22B?
GPT-4o mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (44) and Mixtral 8x22B (33). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct or Mixtral 8x22B?
GPT-4o mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct costs $0.72 input / $0.72 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers); Mixtral 8x22B costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for GPT-4o mini versus $0.72 for Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (2.7× as much) and $3.00 for Mixtral 8x22B (11× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GPT-4o mini scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4o mini 126.6 (#135 of 148), Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 125.9 (#136 of 148) and Mixtral 8x22B 122.0 (#139 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (120.5–128.5 vs 121.0–128.1), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 44.2%, GPT-4o mini 37.7%, Mixtral 8x22B 34.1%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Mixtral 8x22B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-4o mini leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4o mini and Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct have the largest context windows (128,000 and 128,000 tokens), against 64,000 for Mixtral 8x22B. Maximum output per response: GPT-4o mini up to 16,384, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct up to 4,096, Mixtral 8x22B up to 64,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-4o mini accepts text, images and PDFs; Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct accepts text; Mixtral 8x22B accepts text. GPT-4o mini handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Mixtral 8x22B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-4o mini is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct is the newest, released Jul 23, 2024. GPT-4o mini came out Jul 18, 2024; Mixtral 8x22B came out Apr 17, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-4o mini Sep 2023, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct Dec 2023, Mixtral 8x22B Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.