ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-4o mini vs Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct vs Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct

GPT-4o mini comes out ahead, 56 to 46 and 44 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-4o mini

    Released Jul 18, 2024

    56/100
    • ECI126.6
    • Price$0.15 / $0.60
    • Context128K
  2. Meta

    Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct

    Released Jul 23, 2024

    44/100
    • ECI125.9
    • Price$0.72 / $0.72
    • Context128K
  3. Meta

    Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct

    Released Dec 6, 2024

    46/100
    • ECI127.3
    • Price$0.59 / $0.724
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

GPT-4o mini is our pick

GPT-4o mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct (46) and Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (44). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityLlama-3.3-70B-InstructCapabilities Index (ECI): Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 127.3 · GPT-4o mini 126.6 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 125.9
  • Lowest priceGPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini $0.263 · Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct $0.624 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct $0.72 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameGPT-4o mini 128,000 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 128,000 · Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini: Text, Images, PDFs · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct: Text · Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: Text
  • Self-hostingLlama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Llama-3.3-70B-InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-4o miniLlama-3.1-70B-InstructLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%494849
Price25%775760
Inputs & features15%702525
Context window10%242424
Overall100%56/10044/10046/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-4o mini vs Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct vs Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-4o miniOpenAILlama-3.1-70B-InstructMetaLlama-3.3-70B-InstructMeta
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)126.6125.9127.3 (best)
ECI rank#135 of 148#136 of 148#133 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions37.7%44.2%47.4% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics0.7%——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics6.9% (best)3.6%5.1%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions8.3%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.15 (best)$0.72$0.59
Output$0.60 (best)$0.72$0.724
Cached input$0.075——
Blended (3:1)$0.263 (best)$0.72$0.624
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIMedian of 5 providersMedian of 21 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output16,384 tokens (best)4,096 tokens4,096 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpen
API model IDgpt-4o-mini—llama-3.3-70b-instruct
API providers21524 (best)
ReleasedJul 18, 2024Jul 23, 2024Dec 6, 2024
Knowledge cutoffSep 2023Dec 2023Dec 2023
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-4o mini$2.70
  • Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct$8.64
  • Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct$7.35
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct or Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct?

GPT-4o mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct (46) and Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (44). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct or Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct?

GPT-4o mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct costs $0.59 input / $0.724 output per million tokens (median across 21 API providers; free on Llama); Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct costs $0.72 input / $0.72 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.263 per million tokens for GPT-4o mini versus $0.624 for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct (2.4× as much) and $0.72 for Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (2.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 127.3 (#133 of 148), GPT-4o mini 126.6 (#135 of 148) and Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 125.9 (#136 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (122.5–129.5 vs 120.5–128.5), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 47.4%, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 44.2%, GPT-4o mini 37.7%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-4o mini 6.9%, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 5.1%, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 3.6%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct share the same 128,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: GPT-4o mini up to 16,384, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct up to 4,096, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct up to 4,096 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-4o mini accepts text, images and PDFs; Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct accepts text; Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct accepts text. GPT-4o mini handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-4o mini is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct is the newest, released Dec 6, 2024. Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct came out Jul 23, 2024; GPT-4o mini came out Jul 18, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-4o mini Sep 2023, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct Dec 2023, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct Dec 2023.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.