GPT-4o mini vs Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct vs Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
GPT-4o mini comes out ahead, 56 to 46 and 44 on our weighted score, though Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct is 41% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
56/100- ECI126.6
- Price$0.15 / $0.60
- Context128K
Meta
Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct
44/100- ECI125.9
- Price$0.72 / $0.72
- Context128K
Meta
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
46/100- ECI116.6
- Price$0.152 / $0.167
- Context128K
GPT-4o mini is our pick
GPT-4o mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (46) and Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (44). It leads on inputs & features. Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGPT-4o miniCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4o mini 126.6 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 125.9 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 116.6
- Lowest priceLlama-3.1-8B-InstructLlama-3.1-8B-Instruct $0.156 · GPT-4o mini $0.263 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct $0.72 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameGPT-4o mini 128,000 · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 128,000 · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-4o miniGPT-4o mini: Text, Images, PDFs · Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct: Text · Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct: Text
- Self-hostingLlama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Llama-3.1-8B-InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GPT-4o mini | Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct | Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 49 | 48 | 36 |
| Price | 25% | 77 | 57 | 88 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 10% | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 56/100 | 44/100 | 46/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 126.6 (best) | 125.9 | 116.6 |
| ECI rank | #135 of 148 (best) | #136 of 148 | #145 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 37.7% | 44.2% (best) | 27.0% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 0.7% | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 6.9% (best) | 3.6% | 1.7% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 8.3% | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.15 (best) | $0.72 | $0.152 |
| Output | $0.60 | $0.72 | $0.167 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.075 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.263 | $0.72 | $0.156 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Median of 5 providers | Median of 9 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 16,384 tokens (best) | 4,096 tokens | 4,096 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| API model ID | gpt-4o-mini | — | — |
| API providers | 21 (best) | 5 | 9 |
| Released | Jul 18, 2024 | Jul 23, 2024 | Jul 23, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Dec 2023 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
GPT-4o mini$2.70
Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct$8.64
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct$1.85
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct or Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct?
GPT-4o mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (46) and Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (44). It leads on inputs & features. Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct or Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct?
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct is cheaper at $0.152 input / $0.167 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers). GPT-4o mini costs $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct costs $0.72 input / $0.72 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.156 per million tokens for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct versus $0.263 for GPT-4o mini (1.7× as much) and $0.72 for Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (4.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GPT-4o mini scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-4o mini 126.6 (#135 of 148), Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 125.9 (#136 of 148) and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 116.6 (#145 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (120.5–128.5 vs 121.0–128.1), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 44.2%, GPT-4o mini 37.7%, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 27.0%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-4o mini 6.9%, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 3.6%, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 1.7%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-4o mini leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4o mini, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct share the same 128,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: GPT-4o mini up to 16,384, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct up to 4,096, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct up to 4,096 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-4o mini accepts text, images and PDFs; Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct accepts text; Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct accepts text. GPT-4o mini handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-4o mini is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct is the newest, released Jul 23, 2024. Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct came out Jul 23, 2024; GPT-4o mini came out Jul 18, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-4o mini Sep 2023, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct Dec 2023, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct Dec 2023.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.