ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GPT-4.1 vs Qwen3 Max

GPT-4.1 comes out ahead, 53 to 50 on our weighted score, though Qwen3 Max is 31% cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-4.1

    Released Apr 14, 2025

    53/100
    • ECI136.8
    • Price$2.00 / $8.00
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove GPT-4.1

  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 Max

    Released Sep 23, 2025

    50/100
    • ECI142.4
    • Price$1.20 / $6.00
    • Context262K
    Full specs Remove Qwen3 Max

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

GPT-4.1 is our pick

GPT-4.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 53/100 against Qwen3 Max (50). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen3 Max wins on capability and price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityQwen3 MaxCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 Max 142.4 · GPT-4.1 136.8
  • Lowest priceQwen3 MaxQwen3 Max $2.40 · GPT-4.1 $3.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-4.1GPT-4.1 1,047,576 · Qwen3 Max 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-4.1GPT-4.1: Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen3 Max: Text
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGPT-4.1Qwen3 Max
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%6168
Price25%2432
Inputs & features15%7025
Context window10%6137
Overall100%53/10050/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GPT-4.1 vs Qwen3 Max specifications side by side
SpecificationGPT-4.1OpenAIQwen3 MaxAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)136.8142.4 (best)
ECI rank#111 of 148#91 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions66.9%72.6% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics6.0%19.0% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics38.3%73.3% (best)
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues48.5%—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions31.1%48.8% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$1.20 (best)
Output$8.00$6.00 (best)
Cached input$0.50—
Blended (3:1)$3.50$2.40 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window1,047,576 tokens (best)262,144 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsYesNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgpt-4.1qwen3-max
API providers25 (best)16
ReleasedApr 14, 2025Sep 23, 2025
Knowledge cutoffApr 2024Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GPT-4.1$36.00
  • Qwen3 Max$24.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GPT-4.1 or Qwen3 Max?

GPT-4.1 is the better all-round choice, scoring 53/100 against Qwen3 Max (50). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen3 Max wins on capability and price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 or Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is cheaper at $1.20 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). GPT-4.1 costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.40 per million tokens for Qwen3 Max versus $3.50 for GPT-4.1 (1.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 Max 142.4 (#91 of 148) and GPT-4.1 136.8 (#111 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (140.0–144.6 vs 133.6–138.4), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen3 Max 72.6%, GPT-4.1 66.9%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Qwen3 Max 19.0%, GPT-4.1 6.0%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3 Max 73.3%, GPT-4.1 38.3%; SimpleQA Verified — Qwen3 Max 48.8%, GPT-4.1 31.1%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 Max yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3 Max leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-4.1 has the largest context window at 1,047,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3 Max. Maximum output per response: GPT-4.1 up to 32,768, Qwen3 Max up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GPT-4.1 accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen3 Max accepts text. GPT-4.1 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. GPT-4.1 and Qwen3 Max are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Qwen3 Max is the newest, released Sep 23, 2025. GPT-4.1 came out Apr 14, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-4.1 Apr 2024, Qwen3 Max Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons