GPT-4.1 vs Mistral Medium 3 vs Qwen3 32B
Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-4.1 53, Mistral Medium 3 53, Qwen3 32B 51). The right pick depends on what you value most.
OpenAI
GPT-4.1
53/100- ECI136.8
- Price$2.00 / $8.00
- Context1.05M
Mistral AI
Mistral Medium 3
53/100- ECI134.1
- Price$0.40 / $2.00
- Context131K
Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3 32B
51/100- ECI138.5
- Price$0.70 / $2.80
- Context131K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GPT-4.1 53/100, Mistral Medium 3 53/100, Qwen3 32B 51/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 32B for raw capability, Mistral Medium 3 on price and GPT-4.1 for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityQwen3 32BCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 32B 138.5 · GPT-4.1 136.8 · Mistral Medium 3 134.1
- Lowest priceMistral Medium 3Mistral Medium 3 $0.80 · Qwen3 32B $1.23 · GPT-4.1 $3.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-4.1GPT-4.1 1,047,576 · Mistral Medium 3 131,072 · Qwen3 32B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-4.1GPT-4.1: Text, Images, PDFs · Mistral Medium 3: Text, Images · Qwen3 32B: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3 32BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GPT-4.1 | Mistral Medium 3 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 61 | 58 | 64 |
| Price | 25% | 24 | 54 | 46 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 50 | 35 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 53/100 | 53/100 | 51/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 136.8 | 134.1 | 138.5 (best) |
| ECI rank | #111 of 148 | #117 of 148 | #106 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 66.9% (best) | 59.5% | 65.7% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 6.0% | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 38.3% | 32.2% | 66.9% (best) |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | 48.5% | — | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 31.1% | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $2.00 | $0.40 (best) | $0.70 |
| Output | $8.00 | $2.00 (best) | $2.80 |
| Cached input | $0.50 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.50 | $0.80 (best) | $1.23 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Official Mistral API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,047,576 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | gpt-4.1 | mistral-medium-2505 | qwen3-32b |
| API providers | 25 (best) | 5 | 14 |
| Released | Apr 14, 2025 | May 7, 2025 | Apr 29, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2024 | May 2025 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
GPT-4.1$36.00
Mistral Medium 3$8.00
Qwen3 32B$12.60
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-4.1, Mistral Medium 3 or Qwen3 32B?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GPT-4.1 53/100, Mistral Medium 3 53/100, Qwen3 32B 51/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 32B for raw capability, Mistral Medium 3 on price and GPT-4.1 for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1, Mistral Medium 3 or Qwen3 32B?
Mistral Medium 3 is cheaper at $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Qwen3 32B costs $0.70 input / $2.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); GPT-4.1 costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.80 per million tokens for Mistral Medium 3 versus $1.23 for Qwen3 32B (1.5× as much) and $3.50 for GPT-4.1 (4.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Qwen3 32B scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 32B 138.5 (#106 of 148), GPT-4.1 136.8 (#111 of 148) and Mistral Medium 3 134.1 (#117 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (135.1–140.4 vs 133.6–138.4), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GPT-4.1 66.9%, Qwen3 32B 65.7%, Mistral Medium 3 59.5%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3 32B 66.9%, GPT-4.1 38.3%, Mistral Medium 3 32.2%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Medium 3 and Qwen3 32B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3 32B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 has the largest context window at 1,047,576 tokens, against 131,072 for Mistral Medium 3 and 131,072 for Qwen3 32B. Maximum output per response: GPT-4.1 up to 32,768, Mistral Medium 3 up to 131,072, Qwen3 32B up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-4.1 accepts text, images and PDFs; Mistral Medium 3 accepts text and images; Qwen3 32B accepts text. GPT-4.1 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3 32B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-4.1 and Mistral Medium 3 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Mistral Medium 3 is the newest, released May 7, 2025. Qwen3 32B came out Apr 29, 2025; GPT-4.1 came out Apr 14, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-4.1 Apr 2024, Mistral Medium 3 May 2025, Qwen3 32B Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.