GPT-4.1 nano vs Qwen3 30B A3B vs Gemma 3 27B IT
Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-4.1 nano 63, Gemma 3 27B IT 60, Qwen3 30B A3B 58). The right pick depends on what you value most.
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano
63/100- ECI129.6
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context1.05M
Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3 30B A3B
58/100- ECI136.2
- Price$0.114 / $0.50
- Context131K
Google
Gemma 3 27B IT
60/100- ECI130.0
- Price$0.08 / $0.20
- Context131K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT-4.1 nano 63/100, Gemma 3 27B IT 60/100, Qwen3 30B A3B 58/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 30B A3B for raw capability, Gemma 3 27B IT on price and GPT-4.1 nano for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityQwen3 30B A3BCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 30B A3B 136.2 · Gemma 3 27B IT 130.0 · GPT-4.1 nano 129.6
- Lowest priceGemma 3 27B ITGemma 3 27B IT $0.11 · GPT-4.1 nano $0.175 · Qwen3 30B A3B $0.21 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-4.1 nanoGPT-4.1 nano 1,047,576 · Qwen3 30B A3B 131,072 · Gemma 3 27B IT 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-4.1 nano and Gemma 3 27B ITGPT-4.1 nano: Text, Images · Qwen3 30B A3B: Text · Gemma 3 27B IT: Text, Images
- Self-hostingQwen3 30B A3B and Gemma 3 27B ITPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 30B A3B | Gemma 3 27B IT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 52 | 61 | 53 |
| Price | 25% | 86 | 82 | 95 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 60 | 35 | 50 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 63/100 | 58/100 | 60/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 129.6 | 136.2 (best) | 130.0 |
| ECI rank | #127 of 148 | #112 of 148 (best) | #125 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 48.9% | 61.7% (best) | 47.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 28.9% | 62.8% (best) | 22.5% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 6.0% | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.10 | $0.114 | $0.08 (best) |
| Output | $0.40 | $0.50 | $0.20 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.025 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.175 | $0.21 | $0.11 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Median of 8 providers | Median of 9 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,047,576 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 16,384 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| API model ID | gpt-4.1-nano | — | — |
| API providers | 20 (best) | 8 | 10 |
| Released | Apr 14, 2025 | Apr 28, 2025 | Mar 12, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2024 | — | Aug 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
GPT-4.1 nano$1.80
Qwen3 30B A3B$2.14
Gemma 3 27B IT$1.20
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-4.1 nano, Qwen3 30B A3B or Gemma 3 27B IT?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT-4.1 nano 63/100, Gemma 3 27B IT 60/100, Qwen3 30B A3B 58/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 30B A3B for raw capability, Gemma 3 27B IT on price and GPT-4.1 nano for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano, Qwen3 30B A3B or Gemma 3 27B IT?
Gemma 3 27B IT is cheaper at $0.08 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers). GPT-4.1 nano costs $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.114 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 8 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.11 per million tokens for Gemma 3 27B IT versus $0.175 for GPT-4.1 nano (1.6× as much) and $0.21 for Qwen3 30B A3B (1.9× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Qwen3 30B A3B scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 30B A3B 136.2 (#112 of 148), Gemma 3 27B IT 130.0 (#125 of 148) and GPT-4.1 nano 129.6 (#127 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (130.3–138.7 vs 124.1–132.2), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen3 30B A3B 61.7%, GPT-4.1 nano 48.9%, Gemma 3 27B IT 47.7%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3 30B A3B 62.8%, GPT-4.1 nano 28.9%, Gemma 3 27B IT 22.5%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-4.1 nano, Qwen3 30B A3B and Gemma 3 27B IT yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3 30B A3B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 nano has the largest context window at 1,047,576 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3 30B A3B and 131,072 for Gemma 3 27B IT. Maximum output per response: GPT-4.1 nano up to 32,768, Qwen3 30B A3B up to 16,384, Gemma 3 27B IT up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-4.1 nano accepts text and images; Qwen3 30B A3B accepts text; Gemma 3 27B IT accepts text and images. GPT-4.1 nano handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3 30B A3B and Gemma 3 27B IT publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-4.1 nano is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3 30B A3B is the newest, released Apr 28, 2025. GPT-4.1 nano came out Apr 14, 2025; Gemma 3 27B IT came out Mar 12, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-4.1 nano Apr 2024, Gemma 3 27B IT Aug 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.