GPT-4.1 mini vs Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 Max
Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-4.1 mini 60, Claude Haiku 4.5 58, Qwen3 Max 50). The right pick depends on what you value most.
OpenAIGPT-4.1 mini
60/100- ECI135.0
- Price$0.40 / $1.60
- Context1.05M
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5
58/100- ECI142.4
- Price$1.00 / $5.00
- Context200K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 Max
50/100- ECI142.4
- Price$1.20 / $6.00
- Context262K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT-4.1 mini 60/100, Claude Haiku 4.5 58/100, Qwen3 Max 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Haiku 4.5 for raw capability, GPT-4.1 mini on price and GPT-4.1 mini for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityClaude Haiku 4.5Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Haiku 4.5 142.4 · Qwen3 Max 142.4 · GPT-4.1 mini 135.0
- Lowest priceGPT-4.1 miniGPT-4.1 mini $0.70 · Claude Haiku 4.5 $2.00 · Qwen3 Max $2.40 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-4.1 miniGPT-4.1 mini 1,047,576 · Qwen3 Max 262,144 · Claude Haiku 4.5 200,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGPT-4.1 mini and Claude Haiku 4.5GPT-4.1 mini: Text, Images, PDFs · Claude Haiku 4.5: Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen3 Max: Text
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | GPT-4.1 mini | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 59 | 69 | 68 |
| Price | 25% | 57 | 36 | 32 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 70 | 80 | 25 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 32 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 60/100 | 58/100 | 50/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | Qwen3 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 135.0 | 142.4 (best) | 142.4 |
| ECI rank | #115 of 148 | #90 of 148 (best) | #91 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 65.9% | 71.2% | 72.6% (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 6.7% | — | 19.0% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 44.7% | 66.7% | 73.3% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 12.7% | 13.2% | 48.8% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.40 (best) | $1.00 | $1.20 |
| Output | $1.60 (best) | $5.00 | $6.00 |
| Cached input | $0.10 | $0.10 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.70 (best) | $2.00 | $2.40 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Official Anthropic API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,047,576 tokens (best) | 200,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 64,000 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gpt-4.1-mini | claude-haiku-4-5 | qwen3-max |
| API providers | 24 | 34 (best) | 16 |
| Released | Apr 14, 2025 | Oct 15, 2025 | Sep 23, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2024 | Feb 28, 2025 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GPT-4.1 mini$7.20
- Claude Haiku 4.5$20.00
- Qwen3 Max$24.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-4.1 mini, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3 Max?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT-4.1 mini 60/100, Claude Haiku 4.5 58/100, Qwen3 Max 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Haiku 4.5 for raw capability, GPT-4.1 mini on price and GPT-4.1 mini for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 mini, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3 Max?
GPT-4.1 mini is cheaper at $0.40 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price); Qwen3 Max costs $1.20 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.70 per million tokens for GPT-4.1 mini versus $2.00 for Claude Haiku 4.5 (2.9× as much) and $2.40 for Qwen3 Max (3.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Claude Haiku 4.5 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Haiku 4.5 142.4 (#90 of 148), Qwen3 Max 142.4 (#91 of 148) and GPT-4.1 mini 135.0 (#115 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (139.5–144.3 vs 140.0–144.6), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen3 Max 72.6%, Claude Haiku 4.5 71.2%, GPT-4.1 mini 65.9%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3 Max 73.3%, Claude Haiku 4.5 66.7%, GPT-4.1 mini 44.7%; SimpleQA Verified — Qwen3 Max 48.8%, Claude Haiku 4.5 13.2%, GPT-4.1 mini 12.7%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-4.1 mini, Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 Max yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Claude Haiku 4.5 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 mini has the largest context window at 1,047,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3 Max and 200,000 for Claude Haiku 4.5. Maximum output per response: GPT-4.1 mini up to 32,768, Claude Haiku 4.5 up to 64,000, Qwen3 Max up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-4.1 mini accepts text, images and PDFs; Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen3 Max accepts text. GPT-4.1 mini handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. GPT-4.1 mini, Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 Max are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the newest, released Oct 15, 2025. Qwen3 Max came out Sep 23, 2025; GPT-4.1 mini came out Apr 14, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-4.1 mini Apr 2024, Claude Haiku 4.5 Feb 28, 2025, Qwen3 Max Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- GPT-4.1 mini vs Mistral Medium 3Mistral AI · ECI 134.1
- GPT-4.1 mini vs QwQ 32BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 137.6
- GPT-4.1 mini vs DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek · ECI 135.9
- GPT-4.1 mini vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B InstructMeta · ECI 132.2
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 143.5
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI · ECI 141.4
