ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max comes out ahead, 69 to 64 on our weighted score, though GLM-5.3 is 28% cheaper per token.

  1. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-5.3

    Released Aug 14, 2026

    64/100
    • ECI155.8
    • Price$1.40 / $4.40
    • Context1M
  2. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.8 Max

    Released Aug 3, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI156.6
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context1M
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Qwen3.8 Max is our pick

Qwen3.8 Max is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against GLM-5.3 (64). It leads on inputs & features. GLM-5.3 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityQwen3.8 MaxCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.8 Max 156.6 · GLM-5.3 155.8
  • Lowest priceGLM-5.3GLM-5.3 $2.15 · Qwen3.8 Max $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameGLM-5.3 1,000,000 · Qwen3.8 Max 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.8 MaxGLM-5.3: Text · Qwen3.8 Max: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
  • Self-hostingGLM-5.3Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGLM-5.3Qwen3.8 Max
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%8586
Price25%3427
Inputs & features15%4590
Context window10%6060
Overall100%64/10069/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max specifications side by side
SpecificationGLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu)Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)155.8156.6 (best)
ECI rank#24 of 148#20 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions90.9%92.7% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics68.8%74.7% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics91.1%99.4% (best)
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions41.0%45.8% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$1.40 (best)$2.00
Output$4.40 (best)$6.00
Cached input$0.26$0.25 (best)
Blended (3:1)$2.15 (best)$3.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Z.AI APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoYes
PDFsNoYes
AudioNoNo
VideoNoYes
ReasoningYeslow · high · maxYeslow · medium · xhigh
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model IDglm-5.3qwen3.8-max
API providers62 (best)25
ReleasedAug 14, 2026Aug 3, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GLM-5.3$22.80
  • Qwen3.8 Max$32.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against GLM-5.3 (64). It leads on inputs & features. GLM-5.3 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3 or Qwen3.8 Max?

GLM-5.3 is cheaper at $1.40 input / $4.40 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). Qwen3.8 Max costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.15 per million tokens for GLM-5.3 versus $3.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.8 Max 156.6 (#20 of 148) and GLM-5.3 155.8 (#24 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (154.5–158.8 vs 153.7–158.3), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen3.8 Max 92.7%, GLM-5.3 90.9%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Qwen3.8 Max 74.7%, GLM-5.3 68.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3.8 Max 99.4%, GLM-5.3 91.1%; SimpleQA Verified — Qwen3.8 Max 45.8%, GLM-5.3 41.0%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-5.3 and Qwen3.8 Max yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3.8 Max leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-5.3 and Qwen3.8 Max share the same 1,000,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: GLM-5.3 up to 131,072, Qwen3.8 Max up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GLM-5.3 accepts text; Qwen3.8 Max accepts text, images, PDFs and video. Qwen3.8 Max handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

GLM-5.3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.8 Max is proprietary.

Which is newer?

GLM-5.3 is the newest, released Aug 14, 2026. Qwen3.8 Max came out Aug 3, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.