ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GLM-5.3 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2

Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 3.6 Flash 73, Muse Spark 1.2 72, GLM-5.3 64). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-5.3

    Released Aug 14, 2026

    64/100
    • ECI155.8
    • Price$1.40 / $4.40
    • Context1M
  2. Google

    Gemini 3.6 Flash

    Released Jul 21, 2026

    73/100
    • ECI154.3
    • Price$0.75 / $3.75
    • Context1.05M
  3. Meta

    Muse Spark 1.2

    Released Aug 5, 2026

    72/100
    • ECI155.0
    • Price$1.25 / $4.25
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Gemini 3.6 Flash 73/100, Muse Spark 1.2 72/100, GLM-5.3 64/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GLM-5.3 for raw capability and Gemini 3.6 Flash on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGLM-5.3Capabilities Index (ECI): GLM-5.3 155.8 · Muse Spark 1.2 155.0 · Gemini 3.6 Flash 154.3
  • Lowest priceGemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash $1.50 · Muse Spark 1.2 $2.00 · GLM-5.3 $2.15 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemini 3.6 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2Gemini 3.6 Flash 1,048,576 · Muse Spark 1.2 1,048,576 · GLM-5.3 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 3.6 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2GLM-5.3: Text · Gemini 3.6 Flash: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Muse Spark 1.2: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingGLM-5.3Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGLM-5.3Gemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.2
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%858484
Price25%344236
Inputs & features15%45100100
Context window10%606161
Overall100%64/10073/10072/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GLM-5.3 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2 specifications side by side
SpecificationGLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu)Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogleMuse Spark 1.2Meta
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)155.8 (best)154.3155.0
ECI rank#24 of 148 (best)#34 of 148#30 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions90.9%94.1% (best)—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics68.8% (best)59.0%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics91.1%94.2% (best)—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions41.0%66.2% (best)60.3%
Price per million tokens
Input$1.40$0.75 (best)$1.25
Output$4.40$3.75 (best)$4.25
Cached input$0.26$0.075 (best)$0.15
Blended (3:1)$2.15$1.50 (best)$2.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Z.AI APIOfficial Google APIOfficial Meta API
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens (best)65,536 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoYesYes
AudioNoYesYes
VideoNoYesYes
ReasoningYeslow · high · maxYesminimal · low · medium · highYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryProprietary
API model IDglm-5.3gemini-3.6-flashmuse-spark-1.2
API providers62 (best)2515
ReleasedAug 14, 2026Jul 21, 2026Aug 5, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—Mar 2026—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GLM-5.3$22.80
  • Gemini 3.6 Flash$15.00
  • Muse Spark 1.2$21.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GLM-5.3, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Gemini 3.6 Flash 73/100, Muse Spark 1.2 72/100, GLM-5.3 64/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GLM-5.3 for raw capability and Gemini 3.6 Flash on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Muse Spark 1.2?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 input / $3.75 output per million tokens (official Google API price). Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens (official Meta API price); GLM-5.3 costs $1.40 input / $4.40 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.50 per million tokens for Gemini 3.6 Flash versus $2.00 for Muse Spark 1.2 (1.3× as much) and $2.15 for GLM-5.3 (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GLM-5.3 155.8 (#24 of 148), Muse Spark 1.2 155.0 (#30 of 148) and Gemini 3.6 Flash 154.3 (#34 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (153.7–158.3 vs 152.8–157.5), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: SimpleQA Verified — Gemini 3.6 Flash 66.2%, Muse Spark 1.2 60.3%, GLM-5.3 41.0%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-5.3, Gemini 3.6 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GLM-5.3 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.6 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2 have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 1,000,000 for GLM-5.3. Maximum output per response: GLM-5.3 up to 131,072, Gemini 3.6 Flash up to 65,536, Muse Spark 1.2 up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GLM-5.3 accepts text; Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Muse Spark 1.2 accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 3.6 Flash handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

GLM-5.3 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 3.6 Flash and Muse Spark 1.2 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

GLM-5.3 is the newest, released Aug 14, 2026. Muse Spark 1.2 came out Aug 5, 2026; Gemini 3.6 Flash came out Jul 21, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.6 Flash Mar 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.