ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

GLM-5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-5.6 Sol 66, Kimi K2.7 Code 64, GLM-5.1 57). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-5.1

    Released Apr 7, 2026

    57/100
    • ECI149.9
    • Price$1.40 / $4.40
    • Context200K
  2. OpenAI

    GPT-5.6 Sol

    Released Jul 9, 2026

    66/100
    • ECI161.8
    • Price$4.00 / $20.00
    • Context1.05M
  3. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K2.7 Code

    Released Jun 12, 2026

    64/100
    • ECI150.0
    • Price$0.95 / $4.00
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT-5.6 Sol 66/100, Kimi K2.7 Code 64/100, GLM-5.1 57/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.6 Sol for raw capability and Kimi K2.7 Code on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGPT-5.6 SolCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.6 Sol 161.8 · Kimi K2.7 Code 150.0 · GLM-5.1 149.9
  • Lowest priceKimi K2.7 CodeKimi K2.7 Code $1.71 · GLM-5.1 $2.15 · GPT-5.6 Sol $8.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol 1,050,000 · Kimi K2.7 Code 262,144 · GLM-5.1 200,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-5.6 Sol and Kimi K2.7 CodeGLM-5.1: Text · GPT-5.6 Sol: Text, Images, PDFs · Kimi K2.7 Code: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingGLM-5.1 and Kimi K2.7 CodePublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGLM-5.1GPT-5.6 SolKimi K2.7 Code
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%789378
Price25%34739
Inputs & features15%458080
Context window10%326137
Overall100%57/10066/10064/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

GLM-5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K2.7 Code specifications side by side
SpecificationGLM-5.1Z.ai (Zhipu)GPT-5.6 SolOpenAIKimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)149.9161.8 (best)150.0
ECI rank#51 of 148#8 of 148 (best)#49 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions89.9%93.5% (best)87.9%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics36.8%89.1% (best)54.0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics93.3%100% (best)95.6%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues74.2%——
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions34.0%69.7% (best)36.5%
Price per million tokens
Input$1.40$4.00$0.95 (best)
Output$4.40$20.00$4.00 (best)
Cached input$0.26$0.40$0.19 (best)
Blended (3:1)$2.15$8.00$1.71 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateOver 272K: $8.00 / $30.00Same rate
Price sourceOfficial Z.AI APIOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Moonshot AI API
Limits
Context window200,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens (best)262,144 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens128,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoYesNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningYesYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryOpen
API model IDglm-5.1gpt-5.6-solkimi-k2.7-code
API providers404051 (best)
ReleasedApr 7, 2026Jul 9, 2026Jun 12, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—Feb 16, 2026Jan 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • GLM-5.1$22.80
  • GPT-5.6 Sol$80.00
  • Kimi K2.7 Code$17.50
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: GLM-5.1, GPT-5.6 Sol or Kimi K2.7 Code?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (GPT-5.6 Sol 66/100, Kimi K2.7 Code 64/100, GLM-5.1 57/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.6 Sol for raw capability and Kimi K2.7 Code on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.1, GPT-5.6 Sol or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper at $0.95 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Moonshot AI API price). GLM-5.1 costs $1.40 input / $4.40 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); GPT-5.6 Sol costs $4.00 input / $20.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.71 per million tokens for Kimi K2.7 Code versus $2.15 for GLM-5.1 (1.3× as much) and $8.00 for GPT-5.6 Sol (4.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GPT-5.6 Sol scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.6 Sol 161.8 (#8 of 148), Kimi K2.7 Code 150.0 (#49 of 148) and GLM-5.1 149.9 (#51 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (159.3–165.3 vs 148.1–151.8), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GPT-5.6 Sol 93.5%, GLM-5.1 89.9%, Kimi K2.7 Code 87.9%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-5.6 Sol 89.1%, Kimi K2.7 Code 54.0%, GLM-5.1 36.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-5.6 Sol 100%, Kimi K2.7 Code 95.6%, GLM-5.1 93.3%; SimpleQA Verified — GPT-5.6 Sol 69.7%, Kimi K2.7 Code 36.5%, GLM-5.1 34.0%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.6 Sol and Kimi K2.7 Code yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-5.6 Sol leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.6 Sol has the largest context window at 1,050,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Kimi K2.7 Code and 200,000 for GLM-5.1. Maximum output per response: GLM-5.1 up to 131,072, GPT-5.6 Sol up to 128,000, Kimi K2.7 Code up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

GLM-5.1 accepts text; GPT-5.6 Sol accepts text, images and PDFs; Kimi K2.7 Code accepts text, images and video. GPT-5.6 Sol handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

GLM-5.1 and Kimi K2.7 Code publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.6 Sol is proprietary.

Which is newer?

GPT-5.6 Sol is the newest, released Jul 9, 2026. Kimi K2.7 Code came out Jun 12, 2026; GLM-5.1 came out Apr 7, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.6 Sol Feb 16, 2026, Kimi K2.7 Code Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.