GLM-4.7 vs MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B comes out ahead, 63 to 42 and 41 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.7
42/100- ECI143.5
- Price$0.60 / $2.20
- Context205K
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.40
- Context205K
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
63/100- ECI142.5
- Price$0.25 / $2.00
- Context262K
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is our pick
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against GLM-4.7 (42) and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (41). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3.5 35B-A3BQwen3.5 35B-A3B $0.688 · GLM-4.7 $1.00 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed $1.05 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.5 35B-A3BQwen3.5 35B-A3B 262,144 · GLM-4.7 204,800 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 204,800 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.5 35B-A3BGLM-4.7: Text · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed: Text · Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: Text, Images, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | GLM-4.7 | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 50 | 49 | 58 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 | 90 |
| Context window | 20% | 32 | 32 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 42/100 | 41/100 | 63/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu) | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeedMiniMax | Qwen3.5 35B-A3BAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 143.5 (best) | — | 142.5 |
| ECI rank | #84 of 148 (best) | — | #88 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 83.3% | — | 83.5% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 83.3% (best) | — | 70.0% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 32.2% | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.60 | $0.60 | $0.25 (best) |
| Output | $2.20 | $2.40 | $2.00 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.11 | $0.06 (best) | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.00 | $1.05 | $0.688 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Z.AI API | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 204,800 tokens | 204,800 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Open |
| API model ID | glm-4.7 | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed | qwen3.5-35b-a3b |
| API providers | 20 (best) | 7 | 18 |
| Released | Dec 22, 2025 | Feb 13, 2026 | Feb 23, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GLM-4.7$10.40
- MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed$10.80
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B$6.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GLM-4.7, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against GLM-4.7 (42) and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (41). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is cheaper at $0.25 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). GLM-4.7 costs $0.60 input / $2.20 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.688 per million tokens for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B versus $1.00 for GLM-4.7 (1.5× as much) and $1.05 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (1.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GLM-4.7 has an ECI of 143.5, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed has not been scored yet and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has an ECI of 142.5.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-4.7, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 204,800 for GLM-4.7 and 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed. Maximum output per response: GLM-4.7 up to 131,072, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed up to 131,072, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GLM-4.7 accepts text; MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed accepts text; Qwen3.5 35B-A3B accepts text, images, audio and video. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the newest, released Feb 23, 2026. MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed came out Feb 13, 2026; GLM-4.7 came out Dec 22, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GLM-4.7 Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- GLM-4.7 vs Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI · ECI 146.0
- GLM-4.7 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55BNVIDIA · ECI 146.2
- GLM-4.7 vs Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic · ECI 142.4
- MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed vs DeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek
- MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen)
- MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed vs Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed
