GLM-4.6 vs Nova 2 Lite vs Ling-1T
Nova 2 Lite comes out ahead, 62 to 42 and 37 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.6
42/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.20
- Context205K
- Our pick
AmazonNova 2 Lite
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.33 / $2.75
- Context1M
inclusionAILing-1T
37/100- ECI—
- Price$0.57 / $2.29
- Context128K
Nova 2 Lite is our pick
Nova 2 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against GLM-4.6 (42) and Ling-1T (37). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNova 2 LiteNova 2 Lite $0.935 · GLM-4.6 $1.00 · Ling-1T $1.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNova 2 LiteNova 2 Lite 1,000,000 · GLM-4.6 204,800 · Ling-1T 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsNova 2 LiteGLM-4.6: Text · Nova 2 Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Ling-1T: Text
- Self-hostingGLM-4.6 and Ling-1TPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GLM-4.6 | Nova 2 Lite | Ling-1T |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 50 | 51 | 50 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 32 | 60 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 42/100 | 62/100 | 37/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GLM-4.6Z.ai (Zhipu) | Nova 2 LiteAmazon | Ling-1TinclusionAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.60 | $0.33 (best) | $0.57 |
| Output | $2.20 (best) | $2.75 | $2.29 |
| Cached input | $0.11 | $0.083 (best) | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.00 | $0.935 (best) | $1.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Z.AI API | Official Amazon Bedrock API | Official Bailing API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 204,800 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 32,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | glm-4.6 | amazon.nova-2-lite-v1:0 | Ling-1T |
| API providers | 18 (best) | 2 | 1 |
| Released | Sep 30, 2025 | Dec 2, 2025 | Oct 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | Oct 2025 | Jun 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GLM-4.6$10.40
- Nova 2 Lite$8.80
- Ling-1T$10.28
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GLM-4.6, Nova 2 Lite or Ling-1T?
Nova 2 Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against GLM-4.6 (42) and Ling-1T (37). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6, Nova 2 Lite or Ling-1T?
Nova 2 Lite is cheaper at $0.33 input / $2.75 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). GLM-4.6 costs $0.60 input / $2.20 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Ling-1T costs $0.57 input / $2.29 output per million tokens (official Bailing API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.935 per million tokens for Nova 2 Lite versus $1.00 for GLM-4.6 (1.1× as much) and $1.00 for Ling-1T (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GLM-4.6 has not been scored yet, Nova 2 Lite has not been scored yet and Ling-1T has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-4.6, Nova 2 Lite and Ling-1T yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova 2 Lite has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 204,800 for GLM-4.6 and 128,000 for Ling-1T. Maximum output per response: GLM-4.6 up to 131,072, Nova 2 Lite up to 65,536, Ling-1T up to 32,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GLM-4.6 accepts text; Nova 2 Lite accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Ling-1T accepts text. Nova 2 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
GLM-4.6 and Ling-1T publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Nova 2 Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Nova 2 Lite is the newest, released Dec 2, 2025. Ling-1T came out Oct 2025; GLM-4.6 came out Sep 30, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GLM-4.6 Apr 2025, Nova 2 Lite Oct 2025, Ling-1T Jun 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
