Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
Gemma 4 E4B IT comes out ahead, 76 to 71 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
GoogleGemma 4 E4B IT
76/100- ECI—
- Price$0.11 / $0.15
- Context131K
- Google
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
71/100- ECI141.9
- Price$0.10 / $0.38
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemma 4 E4B IT is our pick
Gemma 4 E4B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 76/100 against Gemma 4 26B A4B IT (71). It leads on price and inputs & features. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGemma 4 E4B ITGemma 4 E4B IT $0.12 · Gemma 4 26B A4B IT $0.17 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemma 4 26B A4B ITGemma 4 26B A4B IT 262,144 · Gemma 4 E4B IT 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsGemma 4 E4B ITGemma 4 E4B IT: Text, Images, Audio · Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Gemma 4 E4B IT | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 94 | 86 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 76/100 | 71/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemma 4 E4B ITGoogle | Gemma 4 26B A4B ITGoogle |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 141.9 |
| ECI rank | — | #93 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 73.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 82.2% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.11 | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | $0.15 (best) | $0.38 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.12 (best) | $0.17 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Median of 23 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 32,768 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | — | gemma-4-26b-a4b-it |
| API providers | 2 | 26 (best) |
| Released | Apr 2, 2026 | Apr 2, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemma 4 E4B IT$1.40
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT$1.76
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemma 4 E4B IT or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?
Gemma 4 E4B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 76/100 against Gemma 4 26B A4B IT (71). It leads on price and inputs & features. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 E4B IT or Gemma 4 26B A4B IT?
Gemma 4 E4B IT is cheaper at $0.11 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Gemma 4 26B A4B IT costs $0.10 input / $0.38 output per million tokens (median across 23 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.12 per million tokens for Gemma 4 E4B IT versus $0.17 for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Gemma 4 E4B IT has not been scored yet and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has an ECI of 141.9.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 4 E4B IT and Gemma 4 26B A4B IT yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for Gemma 4 E4B IT. Maximum output per response: Gemma 4 E4B IT up to 8,192, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemma 4 E4B IT accepts text, images and audio; Gemma 4 26B A4B IT accepts text and images. Gemma 4 E4B IT handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Gemma 4 E4B IT is the newest, released Apr 2, 2026. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT came out Apr 2, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Step 3.5 Flash 2603Three-way comparison
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603StepFun
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance Seed
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna S 2.1Poolside
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5 FlashAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 144.0
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek · ECI 146.1
