ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemma 4 31B IT vs GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.5 Flash

GPT-6 Luna comes out ahead, 77 to 71 and 61 on our weighted score, though Qwen3.5 Flash is 13% cheaper per token.

  1. Google

    Gemma 4 31B IT

    Released Apr 2, 2026

    61/100
    • ECI142.8
    • Price$0.14 / $0.40
    • Context262K
  2. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-6 Luna

    Released Sep 22, 2026

    77/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.50
    • Context1.05M
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.5 Flash

    Released Feb 23, 2026

    71/100
    • ECI144.0
    • Price$0.10 / $0.40
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

GPT-6 Luna is our pick

GPT-6 Luna is the better all-round choice, scoring 77/100 against Qwen3.5 Flash (71) and Gemma 4 31B IT (61). It leads on capability. Qwen3.5 Flash wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified), because GPT-6 Luna has no Capabilities Index score yet.

  • CapabilityGPT-6 LunaShared benchmarks: GPT-6 Luna 76.9% · Qwen3.5 Flash 62.4% · Gemma 4 31B IT 53.2%
  • Lowest priceQwen3.5 FlashQwen3.5 Flash $0.175 · GPT-6 Luna $0.20 · Gemma 4 31B IT $0.205 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-6 LunaGPT-6 Luna 1,050,000 · Qwen3.5 Flash 1,000,000 · Gemma 4 31B IT 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-6 Luna and Qwen3.5 FlashGemma 4 31B IT: Text, Images · GPT-6 Luna: Text, Images, PDFs · Qwen3.5 Flash: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingGemma 4 31B ITPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemma 4 31B ITGPT-6 LunaQwen3.5 Flash
CapabilityShared benchmarks50%537762
Price25%838386
Inputs & features15%708080
Context window10%376160
Overall100%61/10077/10071/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemma 4 31B IT vs GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.5 Flash specifications side by side
SpecificationGemma 4 31B ITGoogleGPT-6 LunaOpenAIQwen3.5 FlashAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)142.8—144.0 (best)
ECI rank#86 of 148—#82 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions75.8%90.5% (best)82.3%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—79.0% (best)18.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics73.3%98.9% (best)84.4%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions10.4%41.4% (best)20.3%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.14$0.10 (best)$0.10 (best)
Output$0.40 (best)$0.50$0.40 (best)
Cached input—$0.01$0.01
Blended (3:1)$0.205$0.20$0.175 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateOver 272K: $0.20 / $0.75Same rate
Price sourceMedian of 30 providersOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens1,050,000 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens128,000 tokens (best)65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoYesNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningYesYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgemma-4-31b-itgpt-6-lunaqwen3.5-flash
API providers38 (best)248
ReleasedApr 2, 2026Sep 22, 2026Feb 23, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—May 18, 2026—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemma 4 31B IT$2.20
  • GPT-6 Luna$2.00
  • Qwen3.5 Flash$1.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemma 4 31B IT, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen3.5 Flash?

GPT-6 Luna is the better all-round choice, scoring 77/100 against Qwen3.5 Flash (71) and Gemma 4 31B IT (61). It leads on capability. Qwen3.5 Flash wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified), because GPT-6 Luna has no Capabilities Index score yet.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B IT, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen3.5 Flash?

Qwen3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Gemma 4 31B IT costs $0.14 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (median across 30 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for Qwen3.5 Flash versus $0.20 for GPT-6 Luna (1.1× as much) and $0.205 for Gemma 4 31B IT (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond, OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 and SimpleQA Verified): GPT-6 Luna 76.9%, Qwen3.5 Flash 62.4% and Gemma 4 31B IT 53.2%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GPT-6 Luna 90.5%, Qwen3.5 Flash 82.3%, Gemma 4 31B IT 75.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-6 Luna 98.9%, Qwen3.5 Flash 84.4%, Gemma 4 31B IT 73.3%; SimpleQA Verified — GPT-6 Luna 41.4%, Qwen3.5 Flash 20.3%, Gemma 4 31B IT 10.4%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 4 31B IT, GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3.5 Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-6 Luna leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Luna has the largest context window at 1,050,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.5 Flash and 262,144 for Gemma 4 31B IT. Maximum output per response: Gemma 4 31B IT up to 32,768, GPT-6 Luna up to 128,000, Qwen3.5 Flash up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemma 4 31B IT accepts text and images; GPT-6 Luna accepts text, images and PDFs; Qwen3.5 Flash accepts text, images and video. GPT-6 Luna handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Gemma 4 31B IT publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3.5 Flash is proprietary.

Which is newer?

GPT-6 Luna is the newest, released Sep 22, 2026. Gemma 4 31B IT came out Apr 2, 2026; Qwen3.5 Flash came out Feb 23, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-6 Luna May 18, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.