Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
Gemma 4 12B IT comes out ahead, 75 to 71 on our weighted score, though Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is 30% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
GoogleGemma 4 12B IT
75/100- ECI—
- Price$0.075 / $0.275
- Context262K
NVIDIANemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
71/100- ECI—
- Price$0.05 / $0.20
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemma 4 12B IT is our pick
Gemma 4 12B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 75/100 against Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B (71). It leads on inputs & features. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B $0.087 · Gemma 4 12B IT $0.125 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameGemma 4 12B IT 262,144 · Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsGemma 4 12B ITGemma 4 12B IT: Text, Images · Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Gemma 4 12B IT | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 93 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 45 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 75/100 | 71/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemma 4 12B ITGoogle | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIA |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.075 | $0.05 (best) |
| Output | $0.275 | $0.20 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.125 | $0.087 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Median of 9 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | — | nvidia/nemotron-3.5-lightning-30b-a3b |
| API providers | 2 | 12 (best) |
| Released | Jun 9, 2026 | Aug 11, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemma 4 12B IT$1.30
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B$0.90
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemma 4 12B IT or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?
Gemma 4 12B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 75/100 against Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B (71). It leads on inputs & features. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 12B IT or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers; free on Nvidia). Gemma 4 12B IT costs $0.075 input / $0.275 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.087 per million tokens for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B versus $0.125 for Gemma 4 12B IT (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Gemma 4 12B IT has not been scored yet and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 4 12B IT and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 4 12B IT and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Gemma 4 12B IT up to 32,768, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemma 4 12B IT accepts text and images; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B accepts text. Gemma 4 12B IT handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is the newest, released Aug 11, 2026. Gemma 4 12B IT came out Jun 9, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Laguna S 2.1Three-way comparison
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1Poolside
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Seed CharacterByteDance Seed
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ling 3.0 Flash FininclusionAI
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603StepFun
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Laguna XS 2.1Poolside
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ling 3.0 Flash FininclusionAI
