ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1 vs Viv Fast

Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemma 4 12B IT 75, Viv Fast 75, Laguna S 2.1 69). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Google

    Gemma 4 12B IT

    Released Jun 9, 2026

    75/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.075 / $0.275
    • Context262K
  2. Poolside

    Laguna S 2.1

    Released Jul 21, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.20
    • Context1.05M
  3. Vivgrid

    Viv Fast

    Released Sep 21, 2026

    75/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.13 / $0.40
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Gemma 4 12B IT 75/100, Viv Fast 75/100, Laguna S 2.1 69/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemma 4 12B IT on price and Laguna S 2.1 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGemma 4 12B IT and Laguna S 2.1Gemma 4 12B IT $0.125 · Laguna S 2.1 $0.125 · Viv Fast $0.198 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLaguna S 2.1Laguna S 2.1 1,048,576 · Viv Fast 1,000,000 · Gemma 4 12B IT 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemma 4 12B IT and Viv FastGemma 4 12B IT: Text, Images · Laguna S 2.1: Text · Viv Fast: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingGemma 4 12B IT and Laguna S 2.1Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemma 4 12B ITLaguna S 2.1Viv Fast
Price50%939383
Inputs & features30%703570
Context window20%376160
Overall100%75/10069/10075/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna S 2.1 vs Viv Fast specifications side by side
SpecificationGemma 4 12B ITGoogleLaguna S 2.1PoolsideViv FastVivgrid
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.075 (best)$0.10$0.13
Output$0.275$0.20 (best)$0.40
Cached input——$0.05
Blended (3:1)$0.125 (best)$0.125 (best)$0.198
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersMedian of 4 providersOfficial Vivgrid API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens32,768 tokens256,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYesYeslow · high · max
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenProprietary
API model ID—poolside/laguna-s-2.1viv-fast
API providers26 (best)1
ReleasedJun 9, 2026Jul 21, 2026Sep 21, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——Sep 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemma 4 12B IT$1.30
  • Laguna S 2.1$1.40
  • Viv Fast$2.10
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemma 4 12B IT, Laguna S 2.1 or Viv Fast?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Gemma 4 12B IT 75/100, Viv Fast 75/100, Laguna S 2.1 69/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemma 4 12B IT on price and Laguna S 2.1 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 12B IT, Laguna S 2.1 or Viv Fast?

Gemma 4 12B IT is cheaper at $0.075 input / $0.275 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Laguna S 2.1 costs $0.10 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Poolside); Viv Fast costs $0.13 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Vivgrid API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.125 per million tokens for Gemma 4 12B IT versus $0.125 for Laguna S 2.1 (1× as much) and $0.198 for Viv Fast (1.6× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemma 4 12B IT has not been scored yet, Laguna S 2.1 has not been scored yet and Viv Fast has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 4 12B IT, Laguna S 2.1 and Viv Fast yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Laguna S 2.1 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Viv Fast and 262,144 for Gemma 4 12B IT. Maximum output per response: Gemma 4 12B IT up to 32,768, Laguna S 2.1 up to 32,768, Viv Fast up to 256,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemma 4 12B IT accepts text and images; Laguna S 2.1 accepts text; Viv Fast accepts text and images. Gemma 4 12B IT handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Gemma 4 12B IT and Laguna S 2.1 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Viv Fast is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Viv Fast is the newest, released Sep 21, 2026. Laguna S 2.1 came out Jul 21, 2026; Gemma 4 12B IT came out Jun 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Viv Fast Sep 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.