Gemma 3 4B IT vs Qwen Turbo
Qwen Turbo comes out ahead, 48 to 43 on our weighted score, though Gemma 3 4B IT is 29% cheaper per token.
Google
Gemma 3 4B IT
43/100- ECI116.1
- Price$0.05 / $0.10
- Context131K
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen Turbo
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.05 / $0.20
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen Turbo is our pick
Qwen Turbo is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Gemma 3 4B IT (43). It leads on capability and context window. Gemma 3 4B IT wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025), because Qwen Turbo has no Capabilities Index score yet.
- CapabilityQwen TurboShared benchmarks: Qwen Turbo 24.0% · Gemma 3 4B IT 15.4%
- Lowest priceGemma 3 4B ITGemma 3 4B IT $0.063 · Qwen Turbo $0.087 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen TurboQwen Turbo 1,000,000 · Gemma 3 4B IT 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsGemma 3 4B ITGemma 3 4B IT: Text, Images · Qwen Turbo: Text
- Self-hostingGemma 3 4B ITPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Gemma 3 4B IT | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityShared benchmarks | 50% | 15 | 24 |
| Price | 25% | 100 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 50 | 35 |
| Context window | 10% | 24 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 43/100 | 48/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 116.1 | — |
| ECI rank | #146 of 148 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 23.2% | 41.8% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 7.5% (best) | 6.1% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.05 | $0.05 |
| Output | $0.10 (best) | $0.20 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.063 (best) | $0.087 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 7 providers | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | qwen-turbo |
| API providers | 7 (best) | 3 |
| Released | Mar 12, 2025 | Nov 1, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 2024 | Apr 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Gemma 3 4B IT$0.70
Qwen Turbo$0.90
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemma 3 4B IT or Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Gemma 3 4B IT (43). It leads on capability and context window. Gemma 3 4B IT wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025), because Qwen Turbo has no Capabilities Index score yet.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B IT or Qwen Turbo?
Gemma 3 4B IT is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 7 API providers). Qwen Turbo costs $0.05 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.063 per million tokens for Gemma 3 4B IT versus $0.087 for Qwen Turbo (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025): Qwen Turbo 24.0% and Gemma 3 4B IT 15.4%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen Turbo 41.8%, Gemma 3 4B IT 23.2%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Gemma 3 4B IT 7.5%, Qwen Turbo 6.1%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 3 4B IT and Qwen Turbo yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen Turbo leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Turbo has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Gemma 3 4B IT. Maximum output per response: Gemma 3 4B IT up to 131,072, Qwen Turbo up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemma 3 4B IT accepts text and images; Qwen Turbo accepts text. Gemma 3 4B IT handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Gemma 3 4B IT publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen Turbo is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemma 3 4B IT is the newest, released Mar 12, 2025. Qwen Turbo came out Nov 1, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 3 4B IT Aug 2024, Qwen Turbo Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.