ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemma 3 4B IT vs Qwen Turbo

Qwen Turbo comes out ahead, 48 to 43 on our weighted score, though Gemma 3 4B IT is 29% cheaper per token.

  1. Google

    Gemma 3 4B IT

    Released Mar 12, 2025

    43/100
    • ECI116.1
    • Price$0.05 / $0.10
    • Context131K
  2. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen Turbo

    Released Nov 1, 2024

    48/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.05 / $0.20
    • Context1M
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Qwen Turbo is our pick

Qwen Turbo is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Gemma 3 4B IT (43). It leads on capability and context window. Gemma 3 4B IT wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025), because Qwen Turbo has no Capabilities Index score yet.

  • CapabilityQwen TurboShared benchmarks: Qwen Turbo 24.0% · Gemma 3 4B IT 15.4%
  • Lowest priceGemma 3 4B ITGemma 3 4B IT $0.063 · Qwen Turbo $0.087 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen TurboQwen Turbo 1,000,000 · Gemma 3 4B IT 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemma 3 4B ITGemma 3 4B IT: Text, Images · Qwen Turbo: Text
  • Self-hostingGemma 3 4B ITPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemma 3 4B ITQwen Turbo
CapabilityShared benchmarks50%1524
Price25%100100
Inputs & features15%5035
Context window10%2460
Overall100%43/10048/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemma 3 4B IT vs Qwen Turbo specifications side by side
SpecificationGemma 3 4B ITGoogleQwen TurboAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)116.1—
ECI rank#146 of 148—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions23.2%41.8% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics7.5% (best)6.1%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.05$0.05
Output$0.10 (best)$0.20
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.063 (best)$0.087
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 7 providersOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens (best)16,384 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model ID—qwen-turbo
API providers7 (best)3
ReleasedMar 12, 2025Nov 1, 2024
Knowledge cutoffAug 2024Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemma 3 4B IT$0.70
  • Qwen Turbo$0.90
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemma 3 4B IT or Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Turbo is the better all-round choice, scoring 48/100 against Gemma 3 4B IT (43). It leads on capability and context window. Gemma 3 4B IT wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025), because Qwen Turbo has no Capabilities Index score yet.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B IT or Qwen Turbo?

Gemma 3 4B IT is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 7 API providers). Qwen Turbo costs $0.05 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.063 per million tokens for Gemma 3 4B IT versus $0.087 for Qwen Turbo (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025): Qwen Turbo 24.0% and Gemma 3 4B IT 15.4%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen Turbo 41.8%, Gemma 3 4B IT 23.2%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Gemma 3 4B IT 7.5%, Qwen Turbo 6.1%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 3 4B IT and Qwen Turbo yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen Turbo leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Turbo has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Gemma 3 4B IT. Maximum output per response: Gemma 3 4B IT up to 131,072, Qwen Turbo up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemma 3 4B IT accepts text and images; Qwen Turbo accepts text. Gemma 3 4B IT handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Gemma 3 4B IT publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen Turbo is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemma 3 4B IT is the newest, released Mar 12, 2025. Qwen Turbo came out Nov 1, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 3 4B IT Aug 2024, Qwen Turbo Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.