Gemma 3 4B IT vs Ministral 3B vs Nova Micro
Gemma 3 4B IT comes out ahead, 70 to 62 and 61 on our weighted score.
- Our pick
Google
Gemma 3 4B IT
70/100- ECI116.1
- Price$0.05 / $0.10
- Context131K
Mistral AI
Ministral 3B
61/100- ECI118.1
- Price$0.10 / $0.10
- Context128K
Amazon
Nova Micro
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.035 / $0.14
- Context128K
Gemma 3 4B IT is our pick
Gemma 3 4B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 70/100 against Nova Micro (62) and Ministral 3B (61). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNova MicroNova Micro $0.061 · Gemma 3 4B IT $0.063 · Ministral 3B $0.10 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemma 3 4B ITGemma 3 4B IT 131,072 · Ministral 3B 128,000 · Nova Micro 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemma 3 4B ITGemma 3 4B IT: Text, Images · Ministral 3B: Text · Nova Micro: Text
- Self-hostingGemma 3 4B IT and Ministral 3BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Gemma 3 4B IT | Ministral 3B | Nova Micro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 97 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 50 | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 70/100 | 61/100 | 62/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 116.1 | 118.1 (best) | — |
| ECI rank | #146 of 148 | #144 of 148 (best) | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 23.2% | 25.3% (best) | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 7.5% | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.05 | $0.10 | $0.035 (best) |
| Output | $0.10 (best) | $0.10 (best) | $0.14 |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.0088 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.063 | $0.10 | $0.061 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 7 providers | Median of 1 providers | Official Amazon Bedrock API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens | 10,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — | amazon.nova-micro-v1:0 |
| API providers | 7 (best) | 1 | 3 |
| Released | Mar 12, 2025 | Oct 16, 2024 | Dec 3, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 2024 | Mar 2024 | Oct 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Gemma 3 4B IT$0.70
Ministral 3B$1.20
Nova Micro$0.63
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemma 3 4B IT, Ministral 3B or Nova Micro?
Gemma 3 4B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 70/100 against Nova Micro (62) and Ministral 3B (61). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B IT, Ministral 3B or Nova Micro?
Nova Micro is cheaper at $0.035 input / $0.14 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). Gemma 3 4B IT costs $0.05 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 7 API providers); Ministral 3B costs $0.10 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.061 per million tokens for Nova Micro versus $0.063 for Gemma 3 4B IT (1× as much) and $0.10 for Ministral 3B (1.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemma 3 4B IT has an ECI of 116.1, Ministral 3B has an ECI of 118.1 and Nova Micro has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 3 4B IT, Ministral 3B and Nova Micro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 3 4B IT has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Ministral 3B and 128,000 for Nova Micro. Maximum output per response: Gemma 3 4B IT up to 131,072, Ministral 3B up to 8,192, Nova Micro up to 10,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemma 3 4B IT accepts text and images; Ministral 3B accepts text; Nova Micro accepts text. Gemma 3 4B IT handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Gemma 3 4B IT and Ministral 3B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Nova Micro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemma 3 4B IT is the newest, released Mar 12, 2025. Nova Micro came out Dec 3, 2024; Ministral 3B came out Oct 16, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 3 4B IT Aug 2024, Ministral 3B Mar 2024, Nova Micro Oct 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.