ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemma 3 27B IT vs Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemma 3 27B IT 60, Mistral Small 3.2 60, Qwen3 30B A3B 58). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Google

    Gemma 3 27B IT

    Released Mar 12, 2025

    60/100
    • ECI130.0
    • Price$0.08 / $0.20
    • Context131K
    Full specs Remove Gemma 3 27B IT

  2. Mistral AI

    Mistral Small 3.2

    Released Jun 20, 2025

    60/100
    • ECI131.7
    • Price$0.10 / $0.30
    • Context128K
    Full specs Remove Mistral Small 3.2

  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 30B A3B

    Released Apr 28, 2025

    58/100
    • ECI136.2
    • Price$0.114 / $0.50
    • Context131K
    Full specs Remove Qwen3 30B A3B
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Gemma 3 27B IT 60/100, Mistral Small 3.2 60/100, Qwen3 30B A3B 58/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 30B A3B for raw capability and Gemma 3 27B IT on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityQwen3 30B A3BCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 30B A3B 136.2 · Mistral Small 3.2 131.7 · Gemma 3 27B IT 130.0
  • Lowest priceGemma 3 27B ITGemma 3 27B IT $0.11 · Mistral Small 3.2 $0.15 · Qwen3 30B A3B $0.21 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemma 3 27B IT and Qwen3 30B A3BGemma 3 27B IT 131,072 · Qwen3 30B A3B 131,072 · Mistral Small 3.2 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemma 3 27B IT and Mistral Small 3.2Gemma 3 27B IT: Text, Images · Mistral Small 3.2: Text, Images · Qwen3 30B A3B: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemma 3 27B ITMistral Small 3.2Qwen3 30B A3B
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%535561
Price25%958982
Inputs & features15%505035
Context window10%242424
Overall100%60/10060/10058/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemma 3 27B IT vs Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen3 30B A3B specifications side by side
SpecificationGemma 3 27B ITGoogleMistral Small 3.2Mistral AIQwen3 30B A3BAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)130.0131.7136.2 (best)
ECI rank#125 of 148#123 of 148#112 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions47.7%49.1%61.7% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics22.5%30.3%62.8% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$0.08 (best)$0.10$0.114
Output$0.20 (best)$0.30$0.50
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.11 (best)$0.15$0.21
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 9 providersOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 8 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens (best)16,384 tokens16,384 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenOpen
API model ID—mistral-small-2506—
API providers10 (best)68
ReleasedMar 12, 2025Jun 20, 2025Apr 28, 2025
Knowledge cutoffAug 2024Mar 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemma 3 27B IT$1.20
  • Mistral Small 3.2$1.60
  • Qwen3 30B A3B$2.14
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemma 3 27B IT, Mistral Small 3.2 or Qwen3 30B A3B?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Gemma 3 27B IT 60/100, Mistral Small 3.2 60/100, Qwen3 30B A3B 58/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 30B A3B for raw capability and Gemma 3 27B IT on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B IT, Mistral Small 3.2 or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Gemma 3 27B IT is cheaper at $0.08 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers). Mistral Small 3.2 costs $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.114 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 8 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.11 per million tokens for Gemma 3 27B IT versus $0.15 for Mistral Small 3.2 (1.4× as much) and $0.21 for Qwen3 30B A3B (1.9× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Qwen3 30B A3B scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 30B A3B 136.2 (#112 of 148), Mistral Small 3.2 131.7 (#123 of 148) and Gemma 3 27B IT 130.0 (#125 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (130.3–138.7 vs 126.6–133.9), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen3 30B A3B 61.7%, Mistral Small 3.2 49.1%, Gemma 3 27B IT 47.7%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3 30B A3B 62.8%, Mistral Small 3.2 30.3%, Gemma 3 27B IT 22.5%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 3 27B IT, Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen3 30B A3B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3 30B A3B leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 3 27B IT and Qwen3 30B A3B have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 128,000 for Mistral Small 3.2. Maximum output per response: Gemma 3 27B IT up to 131,072, Mistral Small 3.2 up to 16,384, Qwen3 30B A3B up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemma 3 27B IT accepts text and images; Mistral Small 3.2 accepts text and images; Qwen3 30B A3B accepts text. Gemma 3 27B IT handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Mistral Small 3.2 is the newest, released Jun 20, 2025. Qwen3 30B A3B came out Apr 28, 2025; Gemma 3 27B IT came out Mar 12, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 3 27B IT Aug 2024, Mistral Small 3.2 Mar 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons