ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemma 3 27B IT vs Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen Turbo

Too close to call on our weighted score (Mistral Small 3.2 52, Gemma 3 27B IT 51, Qwen Turbo 48). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Google

    Gemma 3 27B IT

    Released Mar 12, 2025

    51/100
    • ECI130.0
    • Price$0.08 / $0.20
    • Context131K
  2. Mistral AI

    Mistral Small 3.2

    Released Jun 20, 2025

    52/100
    • ECI131.7
    • Price$0.10 / $0.30
    • Context128K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen Turbo

    Released Nov 1, 2024

    48/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.05 / $0.20
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Mistral Small 3.2 52/100, Gemma 3 27B IT 51/100, Qwen Turbo 48/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Small 3.2 for raw capability, Qwen Turbo on price and Qwen Turbo for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025), because Qwen Turbo has no Capabilities Index score yet.

  • CapabilityMistral Small 3.2Shared benchmarks: Mistral Small 3.2 39.7% · Gemma 3 27B IT 35.1% · Qwen Turbo 24.0%
  • Lowest priceQwen TurboQwen Turbo $0.087 · Gemma 3 27B IT $0.11 · Mistral Small 3.2 $0.15 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen TurboQwen Turbo 1,000,000 · Gemma 3 27B IT 131,072 · Mistral Small 3.2 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemma 3 27B IT and Mistral Small 3.2Gemma 3 27B IT: Text, Images · Mistral Small 3.2: Text, Images · Qwen Turbo: Text
  • Self-hostingGemma 3 27B IT and Mistral Small 3.2Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemma 3 27B ITMistral Small 3.2Qwen Turbo
CapabilityShared benchmarks50%354024
Price25%9589100
Inputs & features15%505035
Context window10%242460
Overall100%51/10052/10048/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemma 3 27B IT vs Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen Turbo specifications side by side
SpecificationGemma 3 27B ITGoogleMistral Small 3.2Mistral AIQwen TurboAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)130.0131.7 (best)—
ECI rank#125 of 148#123 of 148 (best)—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions47.7%49.1% (best)41.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics22.5%30.3% (best)6.1%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.08$0.10$0.05 (best)
Output$0.20 (best)$0.30$0.20 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.11$0.15$0.087 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 9 providersOfficial Mistral APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens128,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens (best)16,384 tokens16,384 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenProprietary
API model ID—mistral-small-2506qwen-turbo
API providers10 (best)63
ReleasedMar 12, 2025Jun 20, 2025Nov 1, 2024
Knowledge cutoffAug 2024Mar 2025Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemma 3 27B IT$1.20
  • Mistral Small 3.2$1.60
  • Qwen Turbo$0.90
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemma 3 27B IT, Mistral Small 3.2 or Qwen Turbo?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Mistral Small 3.2 52/100, Gemma 3 27B IT 51/100, Qwen Turbo 48/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Mistral Small 3.2 for raw capability, Qwen Turbo on price and Qwen Turbo for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025), because Qwen Turbo has no Capabilities Index score yet.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B IT, Mistral Small 3.2 or Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Gemma 3 27B IT costs $0.08 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers); Mistral Small 3.2 costs $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.087 per million tokens for Qwen Turbo versus $0.11 for Gemma 3 27B IT (1.3× as much) and $0.15 for Mistral Small 3.2 (1.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025): Mistral Small 3.2 39.7%, Gemma 3 27B IT 35.1% and Qwen Turbo 24.0%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Mistral Small 3.2 49.1%, Gemma 3 27B IT 47.7%, Qwen Turbo 41.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Mistral Small 3.2 30.3%, Gemma 3 27B IT 22.5%, Qwen Turbo 6.1%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 3 27B IT, Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen Turbo yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Mistral Small 3.2 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Turbo has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Gemma 3 27B IT and 128,000 for Mistral Small 3.2. Maximum output per response: Gemma 3 27B IT up to 131,072, Mistral Small 3.2 up to 16,384, Qwen Turbo up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemma 3 27B IT accepts text and images; Mistral Small 3.2 accepts text and images; Qwen Turbo accepts text. Gemma 3 27B IT handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Gemma 3 27B IT and Mistral Small 3.2 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen Turbo is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Mistral Small 3.2 is the newest, released Jun 20, 2025. Gemma 3 27B IT came out Mar 12, 2025; Qwen Turbo came out Nov 1, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 3 27B IT Aug 2024, Mistral Small 3.2 Mar 2025, Qwen Turbo Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.