ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 3 Pro Preview comes out ahead, 67 to 55 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 3 Pro Preview

    Released Nov 18, 2025

    67/100
    • ECI153.0
    • Price$2.00 / $12.00
    • Context1.05M
  2. Anthropic

    Claude Sonnet 4.5

    Released Sep 29, 2025

    55/100
    • ECI146.8
    • Price$3.00 / $15.00
    • Context200K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Gemini 3 Pro Preview is our pick

Gemini 3 Pro Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against Claude Sonnet 4.5 (55). It leads on capability, price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGemini 3 Pro PreviewCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3 Pro Preview 153.0 · Claude Sonnet 4.5 146.8
  • Lowest priceGemini 3 Pro PreviewGemini 3 Pro Preview $4.50 · Claude Sonnet 4.5 $6.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemini 3 Pro PreviewGemini 3 Pro Preview 1,048,576 · Claude Sonnet 4.5 200,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 3 Pro PreviewGemini 3 Pro Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Claude Sonnet 4.5: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini 3 Pro PreviewClaude Sonnet 4.5
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%8274
Price25%1913
Inputs & features15%10080
Context window10%6132
Overall100%67/10055/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini 3 Pro PreviewGoogleClaude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)153.0 (best)146.8
ECI rank#39 of 148 (best)#64 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions92.6% (best)82.3%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—23.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics91.4% (best)77.8%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues72.9% (best)71.3%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions—30.7%
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00 (best)$3.00
Output$12.00 (best)$15.00
Cached input—$0.30
Blended (3:1)$4.50 (best)$6.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersOfficial Anthropic API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)200,000 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens (best)64,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsYesYes
AudioYesNo
VideoYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model ID—claude-sonnet-4-5
API providers328 (best)
ReleasedNov 18, 2025Sep 29, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Jul 31, 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini 3 Pro Preview$44.00
  • Claude Sonnet 4.5$60.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini 3 Pro Preview or Claude Sonnet 4.5?

Gemini 3 Pro Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against Claude Sonnet 4.5 (55). It leads on capability, price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Pro Preview or Claude Sonnet 4.5?

Gemini 3 Pro Preview is cheaper at $2.00 input / $12.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00 input / $15.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $4.50 per million tokens for Gemini 3 Pro Preview versus $6.00 for Claude Sonnet 4.5 (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Pro Preview scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3 Pro Preview 153.0 (#39 of 148) and Claude Sonnet 4.5 146.8 (#64 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (150.6–155.2 vs 145.3–148.5), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemini 3 Pro Preview 92.6%, Claude Sonnet 4.5 82.3%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Gemini 3 Pro Preview 91.4%, Claude Sonnet 4.5 77.8%; SWE-bench Verified — Gemini 3 Pro Preview 72.9%, Claude Sonnet 4.5 71.3%.

Which is better for coding?

Gemini 3 Pro Preview resolves more real GitHub issues on SWE-bench Verified: Gemini 3 Pro Preview 72.9% and Claude Sonnet 4.5 71.3%. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3 Pro Preview has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 200,000 for Claude Sonnet 4.5. Maximum output per response: Gemini 3 Pro Preview up to 65,536, Claude Sonnet 4.5 up to 64,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini 3 Pro Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Claude Sonnet 4.5 accepts text, images and PDFs. Gemini 3 Pro Preview handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Gemini 3 Pro Preview and Claude Sonnet 4.5 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Gemini 3 Pro Preview is the newest, released Nov 18, 2025. Claude Sonnet 4.5 came out Sep 29, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3 Pro Preview Jan 2025, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Jul 31, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.