Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs GLM-5.1 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Gemini 3 Pro Preview comes out ahead, 67 to 57 and 54 on our weighted score, though GLM-5.1 is 2.1× cheaper per token.
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 3 Pro Preview
67/100- ECI153.0
- Price$2.00 / $12.00
- Context1.05M
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-5.1
57/100- ECI149.9
- Price$1.40 / $4.40
- Context200K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.6 Max Preview
54/100- ECI149.2
- Price$1.30 / $7.80
- Context262K
Gemini 3 Pro Preview is our pick
Gemini 3 Pro Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against GLM-5.1 (57) and Qwen3.6 Max Preview (54). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. GLM-5.1 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGemini 3 Pro PreviewCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3 Pro Preview 153.0 · GLM-5.1 149.9 · Qwen3.6 Max Preview 149.2
- Lowest priceGLM-5.1GLM-5.1 $2.15 · Qwen3.6 Max Preview $2.92 · Gemini 3 Pro Preview $4.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 3 Pro PreviewGemini 3 Pro Preview 1,048,576 · Qwen3.6 Max Preview 262,144 · GLM-5.1 200,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3 Pro PreviewGemini 3 Pro Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · GLM-5.1: Text · Qwen3.6 Max Preview: Text
- Self-hostingGLM-5.1Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 3 Pro Preview | GLM-5.1 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 82 | 78 | 77 |
| Price | 25% | 19 | 34 | 28 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 100 | 45 | 35 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 32 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 67/100 | 57/100 | 54/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemini 3 Pro PreviewGoogle | GLM-5.1Z.ai (Zhipu) | Qwen3.6 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 153.0 (best) | 149.9 | 149.2 |
| ECI rank | #39 of 148 (best) | #51 of 148 | #54 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 92.6% (best) | 89.9% | 87.4% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 36.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 91.4% | 93.3% (best) | 91.1% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | 72.9% | 74.2% | 76.7% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 34.0% | 52.0% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $2.00 | $1.40 | $1.30 (best) |
| Output | $12.00 | $4.40 (best) | $7.80 |
| Cached input | — | $0.26 | $0.13 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.50 | $2.15 (best) | $2.92 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 2 providers | Official Z.AI API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 200,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | glm-5.1 | qwen3.6-max-preview |
| API providers | 3 | 40 (best) | 10 |
| Released | Nov 18, 2025 | Apr 7, 2026 | Apr 20, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | — | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemini 3 Pro Preview$44.00
- GLM-5.1$22.80
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview$28.60
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 3 Pro Preview, GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
Gemini 3 Pro Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 67/100 against GLM-5.1 (57) and Qwen3.6 Max Preview (54). It leads on capability, inputs & features and context window. GLM-5.1 wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Pro Preview, GLM-5.1 or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
GLM-5.1 is cheaper at $1.40 input / $4.40 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). Qwen3.6 Max Preview costs $1.30 input / $7.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Gemini 3 Pro Preview costs $2.00 input / $12.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.15 per million tokens for GLM-5.1 versus $2.92 for Qwen3.6 Max Preview (1.4× as much) and $4.50 for Gemini 3 Pro Preview (2.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Gemini 3 Pro Preview scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3 Pro Preview 153.0 (#39 of 148), GLM-5.1 149.9 (#51 of 148) and Qwen3.6 Max Preview 149.2 (#54 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (150.6–155.2 vs 148.0–151.6), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemini 3 Pro Preview 92.6%, GLM-5.1 89.9%, Qwen3.6 Max Preview 87.4%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GLM-5.1 93.3%, Gemini 3 Pro Preview 91.4%, Qwen3.6 Max Preview 91.1%; SWE-bench Verified — Qwen3.6 Max Preview 76.7%, GLM-5.1 74.2%, Gemini 3 Pro Preview 72.9%.
Which is better for coding?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview resolves more real GitHub issues on SWE-bench Verified: Qwen3.6 Max Preview 76.7%, GLM-5.1 74.2% and Gemini 3 Pro Preview 72.9%. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3 Pro Preview has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3.6 Max Preview and 200,000 for GLM-5.1. Maximum output per response: Gemini 3 Pro Preview up to 65,536, GLM-5.1 up to 131,072, Qwen3.6 Max Preview up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 3 Pro Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; GLM-5.1 accepts text; Qwen3.6 Max Preview accepts text. Gemini 3 Pro Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
GLM-5.1 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 3 Pro Preview and Qwen3.6 Max Preview is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the newest, released Apr 20, 2026. GLM-5.1 came out Apr 7, 2026; Gemini 3 Pro Preview came out Nov 18, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3 Pro Preview Jan 2025, Qwen3.6 Max Preview Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.2OpenAI · ECI 153.5
- Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic · ECI 152.3
- Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 153.7
- Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs Grok 4.5xAI · ECI 154.0
- GLM-5.1 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI · ECI 150.0
- GLM-5.1 vs Grok 4.3xAI · ECI 149.2
