ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna vs Muse Spark 1.1

GPT-5.6 Luna comes out ahead, 78 to 73 and 70 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Google

    Gemini 3.6 Flash

    Released Jul 21, 2026

    73/100
    • ECI154.3
    • Price$0.75 / $3.75
    • Context1.05M
  2. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-5.6 Luna

    Released Jul 9, 2026

    78/100
    • ECI156.5
    • Price$0.20 / $1.20
    • Context1.05M
  3. Meta

    Muse Spark 1.1

    Released Jul 9, 2026

    70/100
    • ECI154.3
    • Price$1.25 / $4.25
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

GPT-5.6 Luna is our pick

GPT-5.6 Luna is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against Gemini 3.6 Flash (73) and Muse Spark 1.1 (70). It leads on capability and price. Gemini 3.6 Flash wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGPT-5.6 LunaCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.6 Luna 156.5 · Gemini 3.6 Flash 154.3 · Muse Spark 1.1 154.3
  • Lowest priceGPT-5.6 LunaGPT-5.6 Luna $0.45 · Gemini 3.6 Flash $1.50 · Muse Spark 1.1 $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameGPT-5.6 Luna 1,050,000 · Gemini 3.6 Flash 1,048,576 · Muse Spark 1.1 1,048,576 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.6 Flash: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · GPT-5.6 Luna: Text, Images, PDFs · Muse Spark 1.1: Text, Images, PDFs, Video
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.6 LunaMuse Spark 1.1
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%848684
Price25%426636
Inputs & features15%1008090
Context window10%616161
Overall100%73/10078/10070/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna vs Muse Spark 1.1 specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini 3.6 FlashGoogleGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIMuse Spark 1.1Meta
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)154.3156.5 (best)154.3
ECI rank#34 of 148#21 of 148 (best)#35 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions94.1% (best)91.6%—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics59.0%82.1% (best)—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics94.2%98.3% (best)—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions66.2% (best)41.0%57.8%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.75$0.20 (best)$1.25
Output$3.75$1.20 (best)$4.25
Cached input$0.075$0.02 (best)$0.15
Blended (3:1)$1.50$0.45 (best)$2.00
Long-context rateSame rateOver 272K: $0.40 / $1.80Same rate
Price sourceOfficial Google APIOfficial OpenAI APIOfficial Meta API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,050,000 tokens (best)1,048,576 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesYesYes
AudioYesNoNo
VideoYesNoYes
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · highYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · maxYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgemini-3.6-flashgpt-5.6-lunamuse-spark-1.1
API providers2538 (best)13
ReleasedJul 21, 2026Jul 9, 2026Jul 9, 2026
Knowledge cutoffMar 2026Feb 16, 2026—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini 3.6 Flash$15.00
  • GPT-5.6 Luna$4.40
  • Muse Spark 1.1$21.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini 3.6 Flash, GPT-5.6 Luna or Muse Spark 1.1?

GPT-5.6 Luna is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against Gemini 3.6 Flash (73) and Muse Spark 1.1 (70). It leads on capability and price. Gemini 3.6 Flash wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash, GPT-5.6 Luna or Muse Spark 1.1?

GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper at $0.20 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $0.75 input / $3.75 output per million tokens (official Google API price); Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.45 per million tokens for GPT-5.6 Luna versus $1.50 for Gemini 3.6 Flash (3.3× as much) and $2.00 for Muse Spark 1.1 (4.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.6 Luna 156.5 (#21 of 148), Gemini 3.6 Flash 154.3 (#34 of 148) and Muse Spark 1.1 154.3 (#35 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (154.1–158.6 vs 152.6–156.3), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: SimpleQA Verified — Gemini 3.6 Flash 66.2%, Muse Spark 1.1 57.8%, GPT-5.6 Luna 41.0%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 3.6 Flash, GPT-5.6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-5.6 Luna leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Their context windows are effectively the same size: Gemini 3.6 Flash 1,048,576, GPT-5.6 Luna 1,050,000 and Muse Spark 1.1 1,048,576 tokens. Maximum output per response: Gemini 3.6 Flash up to 65,536, GPT-5.6 Luna up to 128,000, Muse Spark 1.1 up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; GPT-5.6 Luna accepts text, images and PDFs; Muse Spark 1.1 accepts text, images, PDFs and video. Gemini 3.6 Flash handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Gemini 3.6 Flash, GPT-5.6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.1 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the newest, released Jul 21, 2026. GPT-5.6 Luna came out Jul 9, 2026; Muse Spark 1.1 came out Jul 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.6 Flash Mar 2026, GPT-5.6 Luna Feb 16, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.