ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 70, Qwen3.7 Plus 70). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Google

    Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

    Released Jul 21, 2026

    70/100
    • ECI145.1
    • Price$0.30 / $2.50
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.7 Plus

    Released Jun 2, 2026

    70/100
    • ECI147.4
    • Price$0.40 / $1.60
    • Context1M
    Full specs Remove Qwen3.7 Plus

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 70/100, Qwen3.7 Plus 70/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.7 Plus for raw capability and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityQwen3.7 PlusCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.7 Plus 147.4 · Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 145.1
  • Lowest priceQwen3.7 PlusQwen3.7 Plus $0.70 · Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $0.85 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.5 Flash Lite 1,048,576 · Qwen3.7 Plus 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.5 Flash Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Qwen3.7 Plus: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen3.7 Plus
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%7275
Price25%5357
Inputs & features15%10080
Context window10%6160
Overall100%70/10070/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.7 Plus specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogleQwen3.7 PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)145.1147.4 (best)
ECI rank#79 of 148#61 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions83.3%87.9% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics26.0%34.4% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics71.1%93.3% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$0.30 (best)$0.40
Output$2.50$1.60 (best)
Cached input$0.03 (best)$0.04
Blended (3:1)$0.85$0.70 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateOver 256K: $1.20 / $4.80
Price sourceOfficial Google APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)1,000,000 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens (best)64,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsYesNo
AudioYesNo
VideoYesYes
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · highYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgemini-3.5-flash-liteqwen3.7-plus
API providers26 (best)25
ReleasedJul 21, 2026Jun 2, 2026
Knowledge cutoffMar 2026Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$8.00
  • Qwen3.7 Plus$7.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3.7 Plus?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 70/100, Qwen3.7 Plus 70/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.7 Plus for raw capability and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.70 per million tokens for Qwen3.7 Plus versus $0.85 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.7 Plus 147.4 (#61 of 148) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 145.1 (#79 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (145.7–148.9 vs 142.5–146.7), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen3.7 Plus 87.9%, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 83.3%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Qwen3.7 Plus 34.4%, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 26.0%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3.7 Plus 93.3%, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 71.1%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.7 Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3.7 Plus leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.7 Plus. Maximum output per response: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite up to 65,536, Qwen3.7 Plus up to 64,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Qwen3.7 Plus accepts text, images and video. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.7 Plus are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the newest, released Jul 21, 2026. Qwen3.7 Plus came out Jun 2, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Mar 2026, Qwen3.7 Plus Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons