Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiniMax-M2 Her
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite comes out ahead, 69 to 45 on our weighted score, though MiniMax-M2 Her is 38% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
69/100- ECI145.1
- Price$0.30 / $2.50
- Context1.05M
MiniMax
MiniMax-M2 Her
45/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $1.20
- Context66K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is our pick
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against MiniMax-M2 Her (45). It leads on inputs & features and context window. MiniMax-M2 Her wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiniMax-M2 HerMiniMax-M2 Her $0.525 · Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $0.85 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.5 Flash Lite 1,048,576 · MiniMax-M2 Her 65,536 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemini 3.5 Flash Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · MiniMax-M2 Her: Text
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M2 Her |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 53 | 63 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 100 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 12 |
| Overall | 100% | 69/100 | 45/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 145.1 | — |
| ECI rank | #79 of 148 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 83.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 26.0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 71.1% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.30 | $0.30 |
| Output | $2.50 | $1.20 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.03 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.85 | $0.525 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Google API | Median of 4 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 2,048 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | Yes | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · low · medium · high | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gemini-3.5-flash-lite | — |
| API providers | 26 (best) | 4 |
| Released | Jul 21, 2026 | Jan 23, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Mar 2026 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$8.00
MiniMax-M2 Her$5.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiniMax-M2 Her?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against MiniMax-M2 Her (45). It leads on inputs & features and context window. MiniMax-M2 Her wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiniMax-M2 Her?
MiniMax-M2 Her is cheaper at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.525 per million tokens for MiniMax-M2 Her versus $0.85 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (1.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has an ECI of 145.1 and MiniMax-M2 Her has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiniMax-M2 Her yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 65,536 for MiniMax-M2 Her. Maximum output per response: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite up to 65,536, MiniMax-M2 Her up to 2,048 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; MiniMax-M2 Her accepts text. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiniMax-M2 Her are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the newest, released Jul 21, 2026. MiniMax-M2 Her came out Jan 23, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Mar 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.