Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Grok 4.3
Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 68, Grok 4.3 67). The right pick depends on what you value most.
GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
68/100- ECI154.8
- Price$2.00 / $12.00
- Context1.05M
xAIGrok 4.3
67/100- ECI149.2
- Price$1.25 / $2.50
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 68/100, Grok 4.3 67/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for raw capability and Grok 4.3 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 154.8 · Grok 4.3 149.2
- Lowest priceGrok 4.3Grok 4.3 $1.56 · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $4.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1,048,576 · Grok 4.3 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Grok 4.3: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 84 | 77 |
| Price | 25% | 19 | 41 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 100 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 68/100 | 67/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle | Grok 4.3xAI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 154.8 (best) | 149.2 |
| ECI rank | #31 of 148 (best) | #55 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 94.4% (best) | 88.8% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 59.7% (best) | 42.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 95.6% (best) | 93.3% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | 75.6% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 73.5% (best) | 33.2% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $1.25 (best) |
| Output | $12.00 | $2.50 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.20 | $0.20 |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.50 | $1.56 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Over 200K: $4.00 / $18.00 | Over 200K: $2.50 / $5.00 |
| Price source | Official Google API | Official xAI API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 30,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | Yes | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high | Yeslow · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gemini-3.1-pro-preview | grok-4.3 |
| API providers | 26 | 27 (best) |
| Released | Feb 19, 2026 | Apr 17, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$44.00
- Grok 4.3$17.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Grok 4.3?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 68/100, Grok 4.3 67/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for raw capability and Grok 4.3 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Grok 4.3?
Grok 4.3 is cheaper at $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00 input / $12.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.56 per million tokens for Grok 4.3 versus $4.50 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (2.9× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 154.8 (#31 of 148) and Grok 4.3 149.2 (#55 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (152.6–157.3 vs 147.6–150.8), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 94.4%, Grok 4.3 88.8%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 59.7%, Grok 4.3 42.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 95.6%, Grok 4.3 93.3%; SimpleQA Verified — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 73.5%, Grok 4.3 33.2%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Grok 4.3. Maximum output per response: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview up to 65,536, Grok 4.3 up to 30,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Grok 4.3 accepts text, images and PDFs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Grok 4.3 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Grok 4.3 is the newest, released Apr 17, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview came out Feb 19, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GPT-5.3 CodexThree-way comparison
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.3 CodexOpenAI · ECI 156.8
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 153.7
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic · ECI 152.3
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Grok 4.5xAI · ECI 154.0
- Grok 4.3 vs GPT-5.4 miniOpenAI · ECI 148.8
- Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI · ECI 150.0
