Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 5
Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 68, GPT-5.6 Sol 66, Claude Opus 5 66). The right pick depends on what you value most.
GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
68/100- ECI154.8
- Price$2.00 / $12.00
- Context1.05M
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Sol
66/100- ECI161.8
- Price$4.00 / $20.00
- Context1.05M
AnthropicClaude Opus 5
66/100- ECI162.9
- Price$5.00 / $25.00
- Context1M
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 68/100, GPT-5.6 Sol 66/100, Claude Opus 5 66/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Opus 5 for raw capability and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityClaude Opus 5Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Opus 5 162.9 · GPT-5.6 Sol 161.8 · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 154.8
- Lowest priceGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview $4.50 · GPT-5.6 Sol $8.00 · Claude Opus 5 $10.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-5.6 Sol and Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-5.6 Sol 1,050,000 · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1,048,576 · Claude Opus 5 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · GPT-5.6 Sol: Text, Images, PDFs · Claude Opus 5: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-5.6 Sol | Claude Opus 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 84 | 93 | 94 |
| Price | 25% | 19 | 7 | 2 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 100 | 80 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 61 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 68/100 | 66/100 | 66/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle | GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | Claude Opus 5Anthropic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 154.8 | 161.8 | 162.9 (best) |
| ECI rank | #31 of 148 | #8 of 148 | #5 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 94.4% (best) | 93.5% | 93.9% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 59.7% | 89.1% (best) | 85.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 95.6% | 100% (best) | 98.9% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | 75.6% | — | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 73.5% (best) | 69.7% | 59.9% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $2.00 (best) | $4.00 | $5.00 |
| Output | $12.00 (best) | $20.00 | $25.00 |
| Cached input | $0.20 (best) | $0.40 | $0.50 |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.50 (best) | $8.00 | $10.00 |
| Long-context rate | Over 200K: $4.00 / $18.00 | Over 272K: $8.00 / $30.00 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Google API | Official OpenAI API | Official Anthropic API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gemini-3.1-pro-preview | gpt-5.6-sol | claude-opus-5 |
| API providers | 26 | 40 (best) | 35 |
| Released | Feb 19, 2026 | Jul 9, 2026 | Jul 24, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | Feb 16, 2026 | May 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$44.00
- GPT-5.6 Sol$80.00
- Claude Opus 5$100.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, GPT-5.6 Sol or Claude Opus 5?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 68/100, GPT-5.6 Sol 66/100, Claude Opus 5 66/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Opus 5 for raw capability and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, GPT-5.6 Sol or Claude Opus 5?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is cheaper at $2.00 input / $12.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). GPT-5.6 Sol costs $4.00 input / $20.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price); Claude Opus 5 costs $5.00 input / $25.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $4.50 per million tokens for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview versus $8.00 for GPT-5.6 Sol (1.8× as much) and $10.00 for Claude Opus 5 (2.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Claude Opus 5 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Opus 5 162.9 (#5 of 148), GPT-5.6 Sol 161.8 (#8 of 148) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 154.8 (#31 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (160.2–166.7 vs 159.3–165.3), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 94.4%, Claude Opus 5 93.9%, GPT-5.6 Sol 93.5%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-5.6 Sol 89.1%, Claude Opus 5 85.6%, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 59.7%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-5.6 Sol 100%, Claude Opus 5 98.9%, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 95.6%; SimpleQA Verified — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 73.5%, GPT-5.6 Sol 69.7%, Claude Opus 5 59.9%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Opus 5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Claude Opus 5 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.6 Sol and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview have the largest context windows (1,050,000 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 5. Maximum output per response: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview up to 65,536, GPT-5.6 Sol up to 128,000, Claude Opus 5 up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; GPT-5.6 Sol accepts text, images and PDFs; Claude Opus 5 accepts text, images and PDFs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Opus 5 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Claude Opus 5 is the newest, released Jul 24, 2026. GPT-5.6 Sol came out Jul 9, 2026; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview came out Feb 19, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Jan 2025, GPT-5.6 Sol Feb 16, 2026, Claude Opus 5 May 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.3 CodexOpenAI · ECI 156.8
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 153.7
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic · ECI 152.3
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Grok 4.5xAI · ECI 154.0
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K3Moonshot AI · ECI 157.6
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.7xAI
