ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 3 Pro Preview

Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 68, Gemini 3 Pro Preview 67). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Google

    Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

    Released Feb 19, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI154.8
    • Price$2.00 / $12.00
    • Context1.05M
  2. Google

    Gemini 3 Pro Preview

    Released Nov 18, 2025

    67/100
    • ECI153.0
    • Price$2.00 / $12.00
    • Context1.05M
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 68/100, Gemini 3 Pro Preview 67/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 154.8 · Gemini 3 Pro Preview 153.0
  • Lowest priceSame priceGemini 3.1 Pro Preview $4.50 · Gemini 3 Pro Preview $4.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameGemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1,048,576 · Gemini 3 Pro Preview 1,048,576 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsGemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Gemini 3 Pro Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3 Pro Preview
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%8482
Price25%1919
Inputs & features15%100100
Context window10%6161
Overall100%68/10067/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 3 Pro Preview specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogleGemini 3 Pro PreviewGoogle
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)154.8 (best)153.0
ECI rank#31 of 148 (best)#39 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions94.4% (best)92.6%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics59.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics95.6% (best)91.4%
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues75.6% (best)72.9%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions73.5%—
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$2.00
Output$12.00$12.00
Cached input$0.20—
Blended (3:1)$4.50$4.50
Long-context rateOver 200K: $4.00 / $18.00Same rate
Price sourceOfficial Google APIMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsYesYes
AudioYesYes
VideoYesYes
ReasoningYeslow · medium · highYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgemini-3.1-pro-preview—
API providers26 (best)3
ReleasedFeb 19, 2026Nov 18, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Jan 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$44.00
  • Gemini 3 Pro Preview$44.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Gemini 3 Pro Preview?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 68/100, Gemini 3 Pro Preview 67/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for raw capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Gemini 3 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemini 3 Pro Preview cost the same: $2.00 input / $12.00 output per million tokens.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 154.8 (#31 of 148) and Gemini 3 Pro Preview 153.0 (#39 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (152.6–157.3 vs 150.6–155.2), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 94.4%, Gemini 3 Pro Preview 92.6%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 95.6%, Gemini 3 Pro Preview 91.4%; SWE-bench Verified — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 75.6%, Gemini 3 Pro Preview 72.9%.

Which is better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview resolves more real GitHub issues on SWE-bench Verified: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 75.6% and Gemini 3 Pro Preview 72.9%. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemini 3 Pro Preview share the same 1,048,576-token context window. Maximum output per response: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview up to 65,536, Gemini 3 Pro Preview up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Gemini 3 Pro Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

No. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemini 3 Pro Preview are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the newest, released Feb 19, 2026. Gemini 3 Pro Preview came out Nov 18, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Jan 2025, Gemini 3 Pro Preview Jan 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.