ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Command A Translate vs GPT-5.3 Codex

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview comes out ahead, 52 to 42 and 17 on our weighted score.

  1. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

    Released Feb 19, 2026

    52/100
    • ECI154.8
    • Price$2.00 / $12.00
    • Context1.05M
  2. Cohere

    Command A Translate

    Released Aug 28, 2025

    17/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.50 / $10.00
    • Context8K
  3. OpenAI

    GPT-5.3 Codex

    Released Feb 5, 2026

    42/100
    • ECI156.8
    • Price$1.75 / $14.00
    • Context400K
01 — Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is our pick

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against GPT-5.3 Codex (42) and Command A Translate (17). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceCommand A TranslateCommand A Translate $4.38 · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $4.50 · GPT-5.3 Codex $4.81 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1,048,576 · GPT-5.3 Codex 400,000 · Command A Translate 8,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Command A Translate: Text · GPT-5.3 Codex: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingCommand A TranslatePublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewCommand A TranslateGPT-5.3 Codex
Price50%191918
Inputs & features30%1002580
Context window20%61044
Overall100%52/10017/10042/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Command A Translate vs GPT-5.3 Codex specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogleCommand A TranslateCohereGPT-5.3 CodexOpenAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)154.8—156.8 (best)
ECI rank#31 of 148—#18 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions94.4%——
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics59.7%——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics95.6%——
SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues75.6% (best)—74.8%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions73.5%——
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$2.50$1.75 (best)
Output$12.00$10.00 (best)$14.00
Cached input$0.20—$0.175 (best)
Blended (3:1)$4.50$4.38 (best)$4.81
Long-context rateOver 200K: $4.00 / $18.00Same rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Google APIOfficial Cohere APIOfficial OpenAI API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)8,000 tokens400,000 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens8,000 tokens128,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsYesNoYes
AudioYesNoNo
VideoYesNoNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · highNoYeslow · medium · high · xhigh
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model IDgemini-3.1-pro-previewcommand-a-translate-08-2025gpt-5.3-codex
API providers26 (best)119
ReleasedFeb 19, 2026Aug 28, 2025Feb 5, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Jun 1, 2024Aug 31, 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$44.00
  • Command A Translate$45.00
  • GPT-5.3 Codex$45.50
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, Command A Translate or GPT-5.3 Codex?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against GPT-5.3 Codex (42) and Command A Translate (17). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, Command A Translate or GPT-5.3 Codex?

Command A Translate is cheaper at $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00 input / $12.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price); GPT-5.3 Codex costs $1.75 input / $14.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $4.38 per million tokens for Command A Translate versus $4.50 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (1× as much) and $4.81 for GPT-5.3 Codex (1.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has an ECI of 154.8, Command A Translate has not been scored yet and GPT-5.3 Codex has an ECI of 156.8.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Command A Translate yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 400,000 for GPT-5.3 Codex and 8,000 for Command A Translate. Maximum output per response: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview up to 65,536, Command A Translate up to 8,000, GPT-5.3 Codex up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Command A Translate accepts text; GPT-5.3 Codex accepts text, images and PDFs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Command A Translate publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-5.3 Codex is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the newest, released Feb 19, 2026. GPT-5.3 Codex came out Feb 5, 2026; Command A Translate came out Aug 28, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Jan 2025, Command A Translate Jun 1, 2024, GPT-5.3 Codex Aug 31, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.