ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2-Pro

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite comes out ahead, 73 to 54 on our weighted score.

  1. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

    Released May 7, 2026

    73/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.25 / $1.50
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

  2. Xiaomi

    MiMo-V2-Pro

    Released Mar 18, 2026Deprecated

    54/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.435 / $0.87
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove MiMo-V2-Pro

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is our pick

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against MiMo-V2-Pro (54). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMiMo-V2-ProMiMo-V2-Pro $0.544 · Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $0.563 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameGemini 3.1 Flash Lite 1,048,576 · MiMo-V2-Pro 1,048,576 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · MiMo-V2-Pro: Text
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Pro
Price50%6262
Inputs & features30%10035
Context window20%6161
Overall100%73/10054/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2-Pro specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogleMiMo-V2-ProXiaomi
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.25 (best)$0.435
Output$1.50$0.87 (best)
Cached input$0.025$0.0036 (best)
Blended (3:1)$0.563$0.544 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Google APIOfficial Xiaomi API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsYesNo
AudioYesNo
VideoYesNo
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · highYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgemini-3.1-flash-litemimo-v2-pro
API providers23 (best)4
ReleasedMay 7, 2026Mar 18, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Dec 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$5.50
  • MiMo-V2-Pro$6.09
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2-Pro?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against MiMo-V2-Pro (54). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.435 input / $0.87 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price). Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.544 per million tokens for MiMo-V2-Pro versus $0.563 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2-Pro has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2-Pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2-Pro share the same 1,048,576-token context window. Maximum output per response: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite up to 65,536, MiMo-V2-Pro up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; MiMo-V2-Pro accepts text. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2-Pro are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the newest, released May 7, 2026. MiMo-V2-Pro came out Mar 18, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Jan 2025, MiMo-V2-Pro Dec 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons