Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Gemini 3 Flash Preview comes out ahead, 73 to 68 on our weighted score, though Gemini 2.5 Flash is 24% cheaper per token.
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash
68/100- ECI140.8
- Price$0.30 / $2.50
- Context1.05M
- Our pick
Google
Gemini 3 Flash Preview
73/100- ECI151.8
- Price$0.50 / $3.00
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is our pick
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Gemini 2.5 Flash (68). It leads on capability. Gemini 2.5 Flash wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGemini 3 Flash PreviewCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3 Flash Preview 151.8 · Gemini 2.5 Flash 140.8
- Lowest priceGemini 2.5 FlashGemini 2.5 Flash $0.85 · Gemini 3 Flash Preview $1.13 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameGemini 2.5 Flash 1,048,576 · Gemini 3 Flash Preview 1,048,576 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGemini 2.5 Flash: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Gemini 3 Flash Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 67 | 80 |
| Price | 25% | 53 | 47 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 100 | 100 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 68/100 | 73/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 140.8 | 151.8 (best) |
| ECI rank | #97 of 148 | #43 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 89.4% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 51.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 95.6% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 75.4% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 66.8% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.30 (best) | $0.50 |
| Output | $2.50 (best) | $3.00 |
| Cached input | $0.03 (best) | $0.05 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.85 (best) | $1.13 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Google API | Official Google API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gemini-2.5-flash | gemini-3-flash-preview |
| API providers | 22 (best) | 20 |
| Released | Jun 17, 2025 | Dec 17, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Gemini 2.5 Flash$8.00
Gemini 3 Flash Preview$11.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Flash or Gemini 3 Flash Preview?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Gemini 2.5 Flash (68). It leads on capability. Gemini 2.5 Flash wins on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Gemini 3 Flash Preview?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.30 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official Google API price). Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs $0.50 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.85 per million tokens for Gemini 2.5 Flash versus $1.13 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview (1.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 3 Flash Preview 151.8 (#43 of 148) and Gemini 2.5 Flash 140.8 (#97 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (150.4–153.7 vs 138.5–142.3), so the gap is a real one.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash and Gemini 3 Flash Preview share the same 1,048,576-token context window. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Flash up to 65,536, Gemini 3 Flash Preview up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. Gemini 2.5 Flash and Gemini 3 Flash Preview are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the newest, released Dec 17, 2025. Gemini 2.5 Flash came out Jun 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Flash Jan 2025, Gemini 3 Flash Preview Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.