Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite comes out ahead, 71 to 62 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
71/100- ECI133.9
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context1.05M
MetaLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct
62/100- ECI129.7
- Price$0.225 / $0.69
- Context10M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is our pick
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 71/100 against Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (62). It leads on capability, price and inputs & features. Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 133.9 · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7
- Lowest priceGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite $0.175 · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct $0.341 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 10,000,000 · Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 1,048,576 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct: Text, Images
- Self-hostingLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 58 | 52 |
| Price | 25% | 86 | 72 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 100 | 50 |
| Context window | 10% | 61 | 100 |
| Overall | 100% | 71/100 | 62/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle | Llama 4 Scout 17B InstructMeta |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 133.9 (best) | 129.7 |
| ECI rank | #118 of 148 (best) | #126 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 51.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 7.8% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.10 (best) | $0.225 |
| Output | $0.40 (best) | $0.69 |
| Cached input | $0.01 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.175 (best) | $0.341 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Google API | Median of 4 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 10,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | Yes | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | gemini-2.5-flash-lite | — |
| API providers | 20 (best) | 4 |
| Released | Jun 17, 2025 | Apr 5, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | Aug 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite$1.80
- Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct$3.63
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the better all-round choice, scoring 71/100 against Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (62). It leads on capability, price and inputs & features. Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Google API price). Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct costs $0.225 input / $0.69 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite versus $0.341 for Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 133.9 (#118 of 148) and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7 (#126 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (129.8–136.3 vs 124.8–131.4), so treat the gap as small.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct has the largest context window at 10,000,000 tokens, against 1,048,576 for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite up to 65,536, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct accepts text and images. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the newest, released Jun 17, 2025. Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct came out Apr 5, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jan 2025, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct Aug 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Mistral Small 3.2Three-way comparison
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Mistral Small 3.2Mistral AI · ECI 131.7
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 30B A3BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 136.2
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT OSS 20BOpenAI · ECI 137.8
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek · ECI 135.9
- Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI · ECI 127.5
- Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct vs DeepSeek-V3DeepSeek · ECI 132.3
