Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Trendyol Asure 12B
Trendyol Asure 12B comes out ahead, 54 to 35 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Google
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview
35/100- ECI—
- Price$1.25 / $10.00
- Context128K
- Our pick
Trendyol
Trendyol Asure 12B
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.50
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Trendyol Asure 12B is our pick
Trendyol Asure 12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview (35). It leads on price. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceTrendyol Asure 12BTrendyol Asure 12B $0.20 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextTrendyol Asure 12BTrendyol Asure 12B 131,072 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview: Text, Images · Trendyol Asure 12B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingTrendyol Asure 12BPublishes downloadable weights (Gemma)
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview | Trendyol Asure 12B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 24 | 83 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 60 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 35/100 | 54/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Trendyol Asure 12BTrendyol | |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.25 | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | $10.00 | $0.50 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.44 | $0.20 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Over 200K: $2.50 / $15.00 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Google API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 64,000 tokens | — |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenGemma |
| API model ID | gemini-2.5-computer-use-preview-10-2025 | — |
| API providers | 2 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Oct 7, 2025 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview$32.50
- Trendyol Asure 12B$2.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview or Trendyol Asure 12B?
Trendyol Asure 12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview (35). It leads on price. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview or Trendyol Asure 12B?
Trendyol Asure 12B is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Trendyol Asure 12B versus $3.44 for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview (17× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview has not been scored yet and Trendyol Asure 12B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview and Trendyol Asure 12B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Trendyol Asure 12B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Trendyol Asure 12B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview up to 64,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview accepts text and images; Trendyol Asure 12B accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Trendyol Asure 12B publishes its weights (Gemma) and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Trendyol Asure 12B is the newest, released Feb 19, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview came out Oct 7, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.