ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) vs GPT-5-Codex

GPT-5-Codex comes out ahead, 42 to 35 and 34 on our weighted score, though Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is 45% cheaper per token.

  1. Google

    Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview

    Released Oct 7, 2025

    35/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.25 / $10.00
    • Context128K
    Full specs Remove Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview

  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

    Released Sep 2025

    34/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $6.00
    • Context131K
    Full specs Remove Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
  3. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-5-Codex

    Released Sep 15, 2025

    42/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.25 / $10.00
    • Context400K
    Full specs Remove GPT-5-Codex
01 — Verdict

GPT-5-Codex is our pick

GPT-5-Codex is the better all-round choice, scoring 42/100 against Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview (35) and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) (34). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) $1.88 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview $3.44 · GPT-5-Codex $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-5-CodexGPT-5-Codex 400,000 · Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) 131,072 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview and GPT-5-CodexGemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview: Text, Images · Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking): Text · GPT-5-Codex: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)GPT-5-Codex
Price50%243724
Inputs & features30%603570
Context window20%242444
Overall100%35/10034/10042/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) vs GPT-5-Codex specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGoogleQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Alibaba (Qwen)GPT-5-CodexOpenAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25$0.50 (best)$1.25
Output$10.00$6.00 (best)$10.00
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$3.44$1.88 (best)$3.44
Long-context rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $15.00Same rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Google APIOfficial Alibaba APIMedian of 3 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens400,000 tokens (best)
Max output64,000 tokens32,768 tokens128,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model IDgemini-2.5-computer-use-preview-10-2025qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinking—
API providers210 (best)3
ReleasedOct 7, 2025Sep 2025Sep 15, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Apr 2025Sep 30, 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview$32.50
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)$17.00
  • GPT-5-Codex$32.50
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) or GPT-5-Codex?

GPT-5-Codex is the better all-round choice, scoring 42/100 against Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview (35) and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) (34). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) or GPT-5-Codex?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is cheaper at $0.50 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price); GPT-5-Codex costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.88 per million tokens for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) versus $3.44 for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview (1.8× as much) and $3.44 for GPT-5-Codex (1.8× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview has not been scored yet, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) has not been scored yet and GPT-5-Codex has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) and GPT-5-Codex yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5-Codex has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) and 128,000 for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview up to 64,000, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) up to 32,768, GPT-5-Codex up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview accepts text and images; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) accepts text; GPT-5-Codex accepts text and images. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview and GPT-5-Codex is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is the newest, released Oct 7, 2025. GPT-5-Codex came out Sep 15, 2025; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) came out Sep 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview Jan 2025, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) Apr 2025, GPT-5-Codex Sep 30, 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons