ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Magistral Medium vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview comes out ahead, 35 to 30 and 28 on our weighted score, though Magistral Medium is 20% cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Google

    Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview

    Released Oct 7, 2025

    35/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.25 / $10.00
    • Context128K
  2. Mistral AI

    Magistral Medium

    Released Mar 17, 2025

    30/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $5.00
    • Context128K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

    Released Apr 2025

    28/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.50 / $7.50
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is our pick

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 35/100 against Magistral Medium (30) and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28). It leads on inputs & features. Magistral Medium wins on price. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceMagistral MediumMagistral Medium $2.75 · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct $3.00 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 262,144 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview 128,000 · Magistral Medium 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview: Text, Images · Magistral Medium: Text · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: Text
  • Self-hostingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewMagistral MediumQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Price50%242927
Inputs & features30%603525
Context window20%242437
Overall100%35/10030/10028/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Magistral Medium vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGoogleMagistral MediumMistral AIQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25 (best)$2.00$1.50
Output$10.00$5.00 (best)$7.50
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$3.44$2.75 (best)$3.00
Long-context rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $15.00Same rateOver 32K: $2.70 / $13.50
Price sourceOfficial Google APIOfficial Mistral APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output64,000 tokens16,384 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpen
API model IDgemini-2.5-computer-use-preview-10-2025magistral-medium-latestqwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
API providers247 (best)
ReleasedOct 7, 2025Mar 17, 2025Apr 2025
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Jun 2025Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview$32.50
  • Magistral Medium$30.00
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct$30.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview, Magistral Medium or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 35/100 against Magistral Medium (30) and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28). It leads on inputs & features. Magistral Medium wins on price. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview, Magistral Medium or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct costs $1.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.75 per million tokens for Magistral Medium versus $3.00 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (1.1× as much) and $3.44 for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview has not been scored yet, Magistral Medium has not been scored yet and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview, Magistral Medium and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 128,000 for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview and 128,000 for Magistral Medium. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview up to 64,000, Magistral Medium up to 16,384, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview accepts text and images; Magistral Medium accepts text; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts text. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview and Magistral Medium is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is the newest, released Oct 7, 2025. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct came out Apr 2025; Magistral Medium came out Mar 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview Jan 2025, Magistral Medium Jun 2025, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.