ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs GPT-5.2 Codex

GPT-5.2 Codex comes out ahead, 42 to 35 on our weighted score, though Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is 29% cheaper per token.

  1. Google

    Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview

    Released Oct 7, 2025

    35/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.25 / $10.00
    • Context128K
    Full specs Remove Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview
  2. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-5.2 Codex

    Released Dec 11, 2025

    42/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.75 / $14.00
    • Context400K
    Full specs Remove GPT-5.2 Codex

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

GPT-5.2 Codex is our pick

GPT-5.2 Codex is the better all-round choice, scoring 42/100 against Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview (35). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview $3.44 · GPT-5.2 Codex $4.81 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGPT-5.2 CodexGPT-5.2 Codex 400,000 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGPT-5.2 CodexGemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview: Text, Images · GPT-5.2 Codex: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGPT-5.2 Codex
Price50%2418
Inputs & features30%6080
Context window20%2444
Overall100%35/10042/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs GPT-5.2 Codex specifications side by side
SpecificationGemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGoogleGPT-5.2 CodexOpenAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25 (best)$1.75
Output$10.00 (best)$14.00
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$3.44 (best)$4.81
Long-context rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $15.00Same rate
Price sourceOfficial Google APIMedian of 11 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens400,000 tokens (best)
Max output64,000 tokens128,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoYes
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model IDgemini-2.5-computer-use-preview-10-2025—
API providers211 (best)
ReleasedOct 7, 2025Dec 11, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Aug 31, 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview$32.50
  • GPT-5.2 Codex$45.50
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview or GPT-5.2 Codex?

GPT-5.2 Codex is the better all-round choice, scoring 42/100 against Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview (35). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview or GPT-5.2 Codex?

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is cheaper at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). GPT-5.2 Codex costs $1.75 input / $14.00 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.44 per million tokens for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview versus $4.81 for GPT-5.2 Codex (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview has not been scored yet and GPT-5.2 Codex has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview and GPT-5.2 Codex yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.2 Codex has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview up to 64,000, GPT-5.2 Codex up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview accepts text and images; GPT-5.2 Codex accepts text, images and PDFs. GPT-5.2 Codex handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview and GPT-5.2 Codex are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

GPT-5.2 Codex is the newest, released Dec 11, 2025. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview came out Oct 7, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview Jan 2025, GPT-5.2 Codex Aug 31, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons