Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro vs o3
Gemini 2.5 Pro comes out ahead, 76 to 70 and 65 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash
65/100- ECI134.7
- Price—
- Context1.05M
- Our pickGoogle
Gemini 2.5 Pro
76/100- ECI145.3
- Price$1.25 / $10.00
- Context1.05M
OpenAIo3
70/100- ECI146.9
- Price$2.00 / $8.00
- Context200K
Gemini 2.5 Pro is our pick
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 76/100 against o3 (70) and Gemini 2.0 Flash (65). It leads on inputs & features. o3 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 67%, inputs & features 20%, context window 13%.
- Capabilityo3Capabilities Index (ECI): o3 146.9 · Gemini 2.5 Pro 145.3 · Gemini 2.0 Flash 134.7
- Lowest priceGemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.5 Pro $3.44 · o3 $3.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Gemini 2.0 Flash unpriced
- Longest contextGemini 2.0 Flash and Gemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.0 Flash 1,048,576 · Gemini 2.5 Pro 1,048,576 · o3 200,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.0 Flash and Gemini 2.5 ProGemini 2.0 Flash: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Gemini 2.5 Pro: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · o3: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Gemini 2.0 Flash | Gemini 2.5 Pro | o3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 67% | 59 | 72 | 74 |
| Inputs & features | 20% | 90 | 100 | 80 |
| Context window | 13% | 61 | 61 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 65/100 | 76/100 | 70/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemini 2.0 FlashGoogle | Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle | o3OpenAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 134.7 | 145.3 | 146.9 (best) |
| ECI rank | #116 of 148 | #78 of 148 | #63 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 85.3% (best) | 81.8% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 24.6% | 33.3% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 84.7% (best) | 84.4% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 57.6% | 62.3% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | — | 49.4% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | — | $1.25 (best) | $2.00 |
| Output | — | $10.00 | $8.00 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.125 (best) | $0.50 |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $3.44 (best) | $3.50 |
| Long-context rate | — | Over 200K: $2.50 / $15.00 | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Official Google API | Official OpenAI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 200,000 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 65,536 tokens | 100,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | Yes | Yes | No |
| Video | Yes | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | gemini-2.5-pro | o3 |
| API providers | — | 22 (best) | 18 |
| Released | Dec 11, 2024 | Jun 17, 2025 | Apr 16, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 2024 | Jan 2025 | May 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemini 2.0 Flash—
- Gemini 2.5 Pro$32.50
- o3$36.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini 2.0 Flash, Gemini 2.5 Pro or o3?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 76/100 against o3 (70) and Gemini 2.0 Flash (65). It leads on inputs & features. o3 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 67%, inputs & features 20%, context window 13%.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.0 Flash, Gemini 2.5 Pro or o3?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). o3 costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.44 per million tokens for Gemini 2.5 Pro versus $3.50 for o3 (1× as much). Gemini 2.0 Flash has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
o3 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): o3 146.9 (#63 of 148), Gemini 2.5 Pro 145.3 (#78 of 148) and Gemini 2.0 Flash 134.7 (#116 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (144.9–148.6 vs 143.6–146.9), so treat the gap as small.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini 2.0 Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, o3 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemini 2.5 Pro have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 200,000 for o3. Maximum output per response: Gemini 2.0 Flash up to 8,192, Gemini 2.5 Pro up to 65,536, o3 up to 100,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; o3 accepts text, images and PDFs. Gemini 2.0 Flash handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Gemini 2.0 Flash, Gemini 2.5 Pro and o3 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the newest, released Jun 17, 2025. o3 came out Apr 16, 2025; Gemini 2.0 Flash came out Dec 11, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 2.0 Flash Jun 2024, Gemini 2.5 Pro Jan 2025, o3 May 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 3.5 v2Anthropic · ECI 133.5
- Gemini 2.0 Flash vs GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI · ECI 135.0
- Gemini 2.0 Flash vs DeepSeek-V3DeepSeek · ECI 132.3
- Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3Mistral AI · ECI 134.1
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic · ECI 146.8
- Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 142.4
