ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Fugu vs Fugu Ultra

Too close to call on our weighted score (Fugu 66, Fugu Ultra 66). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Sakana AI

    Fugu

    Released Jun 15, 2026

    66/100
    • ECI—
    • Price—
    • Context1M
  2. Sakana AI

    Fugu Ultra

    Released Jun 15, 2026

    66/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$5.00 / $30.00
    • Context1M
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Fugu 66/100, Fugu Ultra 66/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Fugu Ultra on price. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceFugu UltraFugu Ultra $11.25 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Fugu unpriced
  • Longest contextAbout the sameFugu 1,000,000 · Fugu Ultra 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsFugu: Text, Images · Fugu Ultra: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightFuguFugu Ultra
Inputs & features60%7070
Context window40%6060
Overall100%66/10066/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Fugu vs Fugu Ultra specifications side by side
SpecificationFuguSakana AIFugu UltraSakana AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input—$5.00
Output—$30.00
Cached input—$0.50
Blended (3:1)—$11.25
Long-context rate—Over 272K: $10.00 / $45.00
Price source—Official Sakana AI API
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output——
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYeshigh · xhighYeshigh · xhigh
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model IDfugufugu-ultra
API providers111 (best)
ReleasedJun 15, 2026Jun 15, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Fugu—
  • Fugu Ultra$110.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Fugu or Fugu Ultra?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Fugu 66/100, Fugu Ultra 66/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Fugu Ultra on price. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Fugu or Fugu Ultra?

Fugu Ultra is cheaper at $5.00 input / $30.00 output per million tokens (official Sakana AI API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $11.25 per million tokens for Fugu Ultra versus . Fugu has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Fugu has not been scored yet and Fugu Ultra has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Fugu and Fugu Ultra yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Fugu and Fugu Ultra share the same 1,000,000-token context window.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Fugu accepts text and images; Fugu Ultra accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

No. Fugu and Fugu Ultra are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Fugu is the newest, released Jun 15, 2026. Fugu Ultra came out Jun 15, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.