Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro
Too close to call on our weighted score (GPT-5.5 Pro 65, Claude Fable 5 65). The right pick depends on what you value most.
AnthropicClaude Fable 5
65/100- ECI162.2
- Price$10.00 / $50.00
- Context1M
OpenAIGPT-5.5 Pro
65/100- ECI162.4
- Price$30.00 / $180.00
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GPT-5.5 Pro 65/100, Claude Fable 5 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.5 Pro for raw capability and Claude Fable 5 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGPT-5.5 ProCapabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.5 Pro 162.4 · Claude Fable 5 162.2
- Lowest priceClaude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 $20.00 · GPT-5.5 Pro $67.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-5.5 ProGPT-5.5 Pro 1,050,000 · Claude Fable 5 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsClaude Fable 5: Text, Images, PDFs · GPT-5.5 Pro: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Claude Fable 5 | GPT-5.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 94 | 94 |
| Price | 25% | 0 | 0 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 60 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 65/100 | 65/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Claude Fable 5Anthropic | GPT-5.5 ProOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 162.2 | 162.4 (best) |
| ECI rank | #7 of 148 | #6 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 85.9% | 93.9% (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 87.0% | 87.7% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 100% | 100% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 70.7% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $10.00 (best) | $30.00 |
| Output | $50.00 (best) | $180.00 |
| Cached input | $1.00 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $20.00 (best) | $67.50 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 272K: $60.00 / $270.00 |
| Price source | Official Anthropic API | Official OpenAI API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yesmedium · high · xhigh |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | claude-fable-5 | gpt-5.5-pro |
| API providers | 38 (best) | 19 |
| Released | Jun 9, 2026 | Apr 23, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 31, 2026 | Dec 1, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Claude Fable 5$200.00
- GPT-5.5 Pro$660.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.5 Pro?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (GPT-5.5 Pro 65/100, Claude Fable 5 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.5 Pro for raw capability and Claude Fable 5 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-5.5 Pro?
Claude Fable 5 is cheaper at $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). GPT-5.5 Pro costs $30.00 input / $180.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $20.00 per million tokens for Claude Fable 5 versus $67.50 for GPT-5.5 Pro (3.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GPT-5.5 Pro scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.5 Pro 162.4 (#6 of 148) and Claude Fable 5 162.2 (#7 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (159.0–166.0 vs 159.6–166.1), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GPT-5.5 Pro 93.9%, Claude Fable 5 85.9%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-5.5 Pro 87.7%, Claude Fable 5 87.0%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Claude Fable 5 100%, GPT-5.5 Pro 100%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.5 Pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-5.5 Pro leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.5 Pro has the largest context window at 1,050,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Claude Fable 5. Maximum output per response: Claude Fable 5 up to 128,000, GPT-5.5 Pro up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Claude Fable 5 accepts text, images and PDFs; GPT-5.5 Pro accepts text, images and PDFs. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.5 Pro are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Claude Fable 5 is the newest, released Jun 9, 2026. GPT-5.5 Pro came out Apr 23, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Fable 5 Jan 31, 2026, GPT-5.5 Pro Dec 1, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
