Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Claude Opus 4.6
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview comes out ahead, 68 to 65 and 61 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
AnthropicClaude Fable 5
65/100- ECI162.2
- Price$10.00 / $50.00
- Context1M
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
68/100- ECI154.8
- Price$2.00 / $12.00
- Context1.05M
- Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
61/100- ECI155.3
- Price$5.00 / $25.00
- Context1M
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is our pick
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against Claude Fable 5 (65) and Claude Opus 4.6 (61). It leads on price and inputs & features. Claude Fable 5 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityClaude Fable 5Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Fable 5 162.2 · Claude Opus 4.6 155.3 · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 154.8
- Lowest priceGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview $4.50 · Claude Opus 4.6 $10.00 · Claude Fable 5 $20.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1,048,576 · Claude Fable 5 1,000,000 · Claude Opus 4.6 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewClaude Fable 5: Text, Images, PDFs · Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Claude Opus 4.6: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Claude Fable 5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Claude Opus 4.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 94 | 84 | 85 |
| Price | 25% | 0 | 19 | 2 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 100 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 60 | 61 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 65/100 | 68/100 | 61/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Claude Fable 5Anthropic | Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle | Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 162.2 (best) | 154.8 | 155.3 |
| ECI rank | #7 of 148 (best) | #31 of 148 | #27 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 85.9% | 94.4% (best) | 90.5% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 87.0% (best) | 59.7% | 66.0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 100% (best) | 95.6% | 94.4% |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 75.6% | 78.7% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 70.7% | 73.5% (best) | 47.0% |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $10.00 | $2.00 (best) | $5.00 |
| Output | $50.00 | $12.00 (best) | $25.00 |
| Cached input | $1.00 | $0.20 (best) | $0.50 |
| Blended (3:1) | $20.00 | $4.50 (best) | $10.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 200K: $4.00 / $18.00 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Anthropic API | Official Google API | Official Anthropic API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · medium · high | Yeslow · medium · high · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | claude-fable-5 | gemini-3.1-pro-preview | claude-opus-4-6 |
| API providers | 38 (best) | 26 | 33 |
| Released | Jun 9, 2026 | Feb 19, 2026 | Feb 5, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 31, 2026 | Jan 2025 | May 31, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Claude Fable 5$200.00
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$44.00
- Claude Opus 4.6$100.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Claude Opus 4.6?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 68/100 against Claude Fable 5 (65) and Claude Opus 4.6 (61). It leads on price and inputs & features. Claude Fable 5 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Claude Opus 4.6?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is cheaper at $2.00 input / $12.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00 input / $25.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price); Claude Fable 5 costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $4.50 per million tokens for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview versus $10.00 for Claude Opus 4.6 (2.2× as much) and $20.00 for Claude Fable 5 (4.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Claude Fable 5 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Fable 5 162.2 (#7 of 148), Claude Opus 4.6 155.3 (#27 of 148) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 154.8 (#31 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (159.6–166.1 vs 153.4–157.3), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 94.4%, Claude Opus 4.6 90.5%, Claude Fable 5 85.9%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Claude Fable 5 87.0%, Claude Opus 4.6 66.0%, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 59.7%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Claude Fable 5 100%, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 95.6%, Claude Opus 4.6 94.4%; SimpleQA Verified — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 73.5%, Claude Fable 5 70.7%, Claude Opus 4.6 47.0%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Fable 5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Claude Fable 5 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Claude Fable 5 and 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 4.6. Maximum output per response: Claude Fable 5 up to 128,000, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview up to 65,536, Claude Opus 4.6 up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Claude Fable 5 accepts text, images and PDFs; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Claude Opus 4.6 accepts text, images and PDFs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Claude Fable 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Claude Opus 4.6 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Claude Fable 5 is the newest, released Jun 9, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview came out Feb 19, 2026; Claude Opus 4.6 came out Feb 5, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Fable 5 Jan 31, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Jan 2025, Claude Opus 4.6 May 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI · ECI 161.8
- Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K3Moonshot AI · ECI 157.6
- Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 156.6
- Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.6xAI · ECI 156.6
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.3 CodexOpenAI · ECI 156.8
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 153.7
